This works in MSVC++ but not in Borland C++ Builder:
Borland wants me to writeCode://Can contain a number, string or something class DataType { public: DataType( double num); //Other constructors private: //Contains type and data }; DataType foo( ) { double bar = 1; return bar; }
return DataType(bar);
According to the ANSI/ISO standard, is this required?
Last edited by Sang-drax : Tomorrow at 02:21 AM. Reason: Time travelling
your return type here is DataType, but you're returning a double.Code:DataType foo( ) { double bar = 1; return bar; }
lol.... er, I'm sorry
Reading code back to yourself sometimes does help find errors...I dunno, I've gotten used to reading my code, so the type mismatch sticks out to meCode:Define function foo - no arguments with return type DataType Declare variable bar as double and set to 0 Return from foo with bar
loool .... You remind me myself... lol
One day,I did the same thing...
That is a reg. programmer problem... it is ok ...
C++
The best
I know perfectly well what the problem is.
But because DataType has a constructor that takes a double, MSVC++ does the conversion automatically. Borland does not.
You can write:
double a = 1.5;
DataType d = a;
There's no more ambiguity in writing
return a;
Last edited by Sang-drax : Tomorrow at 02:21 AM. Reason: Time travelling
Good for you
Now you got it right...
C++
The best
