Thread: Is c++ Inherently Broken ?

Originally Posted by upload

How about using a regular class.

Doesn't answer the question of how namespaces are flawed. Your insistence on using a class where a namespace is more appropriate, however, has already been addressed by an answer to a Stack Overflow question that you posted (Namespace + functions versus static methods on a class) and mentioned by laserlight:

Namespaces are for namespaces. Classes are for classes.

and

Don't use classes when you need namespaces.

Originally Posted by upload

Libtardism I guess..

Third time you've mentioned liberalism as if it's relevant. It's not. It's just an ad hominem attack.

Namespaces are for namespaces. Classes are for classes.

So just because she says it makes is true. And what if I tell you that this statement is false.
You are incapable of independent thought, a known side effects of koolaid overdose.

It's just an ad hominem attack.

So in your mind, libtardism is valid and factual, but independent research should be discarded right ?
This explains why libtards are all anti first amendment because it brutally shatters their worldview.


In other words, if libtards say pro-choice is the way to go then it must be true, but how do you explain the fact that 150+ countries have rejected those motivations ?