Thread: Visual C++ 1.52 Executable

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    4,632
    Does anyone know what the name of the executable is for running the dos version of the IDE for Visual C++ 1.52?
    If I remember correctly every "Visual" IDE required Windows, the earlier versions were pre-Windows95 but still required a Windows operating system. The compiler and linker could be invoked from the DOS prompt but the IDE required Windows.

    Jim

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,658
    Quote Originally Posted by jimblumberg View Post
    If I remember correctly every "Visual" IDE required Windows, the earlier versions were pre-Windows95 but still required a Windows operating system. The compiler and linker could be invoked from the DOS prompt but the IDE required Windows.
    Programmers Workbench (PWB.EXE) is a DOS (text) based IDE. - In addition to MASM 6.11, I think Programmer's Workbench was included in Visual C / C++ 7.0. (Visual C / C++ 1.52 has compiler version 8.00 (or 8.00c)).

    For Windows 3.1x, Watcom C / C++ 10.0 was also popular because it supported winmem32 (32 bit apps on Windows 3.1x) as a memory model, without requiring win32s to be installed.
    Last edited by rcgldr; 12-30-2016 at 03:44 PM.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. calling an executable from an executable
    By dee in forum C Programming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-10-2004, 01:32 PM
  2. Command line executable not a KDE executable?
    By FillYourBrain in forum Linux Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-03-2003, 12:01 PM
  3. big executable, no bmp's
    By GanglyLamb in forum Game Programming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-18-2003, 10:51 PM
  4. Executable Name
    By sean345 in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-21-2002, 08:59 PM
  5. How to run executable?
    By hugo in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-20-2002, 04:05 PM

Tags for this Thread