Thread: What is wrong with the constructor initialization?

.cpp

Code:

bloomfilter::bloomfilter(int m, long long p, int c):primenumber(p), tablesize(m), hashfunctions(c), vector <int> A(c), vector <int> B (c){
}

	
Code:
	
.h
public:
	
bloomfilter(int, long long, int);

It saying overloaded, but my parameters are declared.

I thin you have to construct in the same order your arguments are declared.

Why do your last two variables in the initialization list have types?

Originally Posted by MutantJohn

I thin you have to construct in the same order your arguments are declared.

Members are initialized in the order they are declared in the class. The order of initialization list is irrelevant, though most compilers will warn you if it differs from the order they are declared.

Originally Posted by cyberfish

Members are initialized in the order they are declared in the class. The order of initialization list is irrelevant, though most compilers will warn you if it differs from the order they are declared.

Ah, thank you for correcting me. I knew it was something like that where if you weren't using an explicit constructor (where you use curly brackets in lieu of : ) the order mattered, I just wasn't sure on the order of what.