2nd. Many people recommend thinking in c++ By Eckel, but i've found 3 books with this tittle.Originally Posted by Kuro Tensai
the 1st was: Thinking in c++ by Eckel, introduction to standard c++, volume one (2nd edition), written in 2000.
The 2nd was: thinking in c++, volume 2 : pratical programming, by Eckel and chuck allison, written in 2003.
The third was: thinking in c++, written by Eckel, released in 1995.
Which one of these 3 books is thinking in c++ which is recommended by many people?
Honestly, I suggest that you just start with Accelerated C++. If you find that you cannot learn with it, then look for alternatives. Don't go looking for alternatives first, or you'll never get started with learning.
Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
thx, but i'm currently adding the books i need to read to my collection. I've already got most of the suggested books, except 2. Thats y i' m askin, so, no offense and with all the respect, here goes my question again, please help me if you can, i need 2 more books and if I find the one i'm referring 2 in this question, i'll only have 1 left to find. So here goes my question again:
2nd. Many people recommend thinking in c++ By Eckel, but i've found 3 books with this tittle.
the 1st was: Thinking in c++ by Eckel, introduction to standard c++, volume one (2nd edition), written in 2000.
The 2nd was: thinking in c++, volume 2 : pratical programming, by Eckel and chuck allison, written in 2003.
The third was: thinking in c++, written by Eckel, released in 1995.
Which one of these 3 books is thinking in c++ which is recommended by many people?
Yes, you can.
so, i can make an entire os using c++ only?
No, you can't. Nor can you with C.
There are some parts, such as context switching, that must be done in assembly.
I've heard ppl sayin combining asm and c++=natural disaster. But i wanna make my own OS. So u r tellin me i can combine c++ with asm?
Thx in advance, Elysia.
Some things simply cannot be done in C++, such as saving and restoring registers. This needs to be done in assembly.
But you don't want to write the entire OS in assembly. That would be a fallacy.
So write what you need in assembly and the rest in C++. C++ is a low-level language in some parts, like C, such that it allows you to mix and match assembly. It needs be done carefully, but it is possible, and for an OS, it is absolutely critical that you do it.
not true at all. most C++ compilers actually allow you to add inline assembly language right in your C++ source files. look at the documentation to learn how.
