Thread: another question about .net

  1. #1
    Registered User Sekti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    163

    another question about .net

    is microsoft visual c++ .net able to even run on 98 it says only for nt and xp and stuff so by any chance is it able to run on 98?
    +++
    ++
    + Sekti
    ++
    +++

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    3
    It wont run on windows 98...

  3. #3
    Señor Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    560
    Yup, so now if you want to use the new Visual Studio you have to upgrade Windows too? Smart move by Microsoft.

  4. #4
    S­énior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    982
    That's the price of progress I'm afraid. Infact, running Windows 98 (or promoting its use in anyway) is far from a smart move IMO.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    559
    I believe .net needs Microsoft IIS (Internet Information Server) to run. This is on XP and 2000 server editions, but not on 2000 Pro. College (maybe high school, don't know) students can get an educational license that lets you buy MS software at lower prices. If your school has an IT Academy license with MS, you can get the software for free, educational license only.
    Or, you can skip MS and .net.

  6. #6
    S­énior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    982
    >I believe .net needs Microsoft IIS (Internet Information Server) to run.

    No, it will install and can be run without it.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    559
    You're right, I guess you don't need IIS, A network prof told me that. Also runs on W2K pro, apparently. Anyway, here's MS site for minimum requirements: .net requirements

  8. #8
    the hat of redundancy hat nvoigt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Hannover, Germany
    Posts
    3,130
    Yup, so now if you want to use the new Visual Studio you have to upgrade Windows too? Smart move by Microsoft.
    Well, people who use Windows at work probably don't use the unstable Win9x series anyway. Win98 is obsolete. It's 2 generations old.
    hth
    -nv

    She was so Blonde, she spent 20 minutes looking at the orange juice can because it said "Concentrate."

    When in doubt, read the FAQ.
    Then ask a smart question.

  9. #9
    &TH of undefined behavior Fordy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    5,793
    If you look at Win95 compared to NT4 you cant help but feel that 95 was a stopgap that would have been dumped in favour of the NT ranges.......loads of API's arent available.......and the system is real unstable as part of the actual OS code was accessable/corruptable by running processes.....

    Its amazing really that 95/98 went on for so long.......you are better of with Win2K or XP though.....try it and see the differences.....

    Its not just that they are newer products...they are better products with more features.....

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    559
    I agree 2000 is better, heard opposing claims on XP, but there's still a lot of individuals and business's using 95 and 98.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. .NET Windows Application Question
    By obaid in forum C# Programming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-29-2008, 10:32 PM
  2. migrate from .Net 2.0 to .Net 3.0
    By George2 in forum C# Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-25-2007, 04:07 AM
  3. MSVC++ .NET 2005 Express Question
    By cboard_member in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-08-2005, 08:04 AM
  4. .NET Question
    By gvector1 in forum C# Programming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-20-2003, 11:41 PM
  5. VS .NET & XP Pro Question
    By hk_mp5kpdw in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-08-2003, 01:07 PM