Thread: Can objects be used as built-ins?

I'm wondering if and how to make a class return an integer without calling a member function.

Example

Code:

int bar (int a); 

int main()
{
  Foo f(); // create a Foo object

  // Example A
  int a;

  a = f + 1; // Treat f as an int

  // Example B
  a = bar(f); // Treat f as an int

  // Example C
  return f; // Treat f as an int
}

Example A can be done with operator overloading. But what about B and C?


I want to do this so I can make a class, FifoPtr, that behaves exactly like an int except when assigning a new value to it, it does a (% size) before assigning. I'd like to do it without having to call Foo::get_val() or something in examples B and C.

Any ideas?

>>Foo f(); // create a Foo object
This is wrong. This declares a function returning a Foo object.

As for the question... yes, it's possible.
Simply overload an operator int() in the class. You should consider making it explicit if your compiler supports it.
If it doesn't support explicit conversion operators (C++11 feature), then I recommend that you use a get function to avoid evil implicit conversions.