5 times "local function definitions are illegal"

**Elysia** · 01-05-2011

Originally Posted by Borislav

I'm using Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0, with virtual CD - any problems here ?

Extremely.

In the newest version Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Express I can't understand how to start the program and compilator.From Microsoft should make it simplier.

I don't see what's so difficult. Start Microsoft Visual Studio 2010. Load your solution / project (file -> open). Or create a new one (file -> new, and remember to choose console / windows project, and nothing else). Then compile using build solution.

In Turbo C version I haven't tried my program due to the COPY-PASTE problem and I don't want to write it again.

Even more problematic. Turbo C is radioactive waste that should have been locked away forever many years ago.

**Borislav** · 01-05-2011

Originally Posted by Elysia

Extremely.

I don't see what's so difficult. Start Microsoft Visual Studio 2010. Load your solution / project (file -> open). Or create a new one (file -> new, and remember to choose console / windows project, and nothing else). Then compile using build solution.

Even more problematic. Turbo C is radioactive waste that should have been locked away forever many years ago.

I can't see build solution anywhere :
ImageShack® - Online Photo and Video Hosting

At the university we are using Borland C and Borland Pascal and I used to work in these programs. That's why it's hard in the newest.

**Borislav** · 01-05-2011

Salem thank you for your comments.
I'll pay attention

**tabstop** · 01-05-2011

The build menu appears between the Project menu and the Debug menu, but it only appears when you have something worth building. Visual Studio will not just compile a file as a file, you must make a project.

**Elysia** · 01-06-2011

Originally Posted by Borislav

I can't see build solution anywhere :
ImageShack® - Online Photo and Video Hosting

At the university we are using Borland C and Borland Pascal and I used to work in these programs. That's why it's hard in the newest.

You haven't opened / created a project. That is why you see nothing.
You have merely opened a file, which won't do.

**Borislav** · 01-08-2011

OK, thank you.

I don't want to start a new topic, so here I'll post my questiong regarging the program.

Code:

	while(NOMER!=0) 
			{	
				cout << "\n                       NOMER :"; 
				cin>>NOMER; 
				cout << "\n                       VALUE: ";
				cin>>pol;
				addTREE(NOMER, root1); 
				} 
			continue;

That can I do so after the value of "NOMER" is "0", not to show the "\nVALUE: ";
message in the program ? I have a condition, but it shows it yet.

**tabstop** · 01-08-2011

Originally Posted by Borislav

OK, thank you.

I don't want to start a new topic, so here I'll post my questiong regarging the program.

Code:

	while(NOMER!=0) 
			{	
				cout << "\n                       NOMER :"; 
				cin>>NOMER; 
				cout << "\n                       VALUE: ";
				cin>>pol;
				addTREE(NOMER, root1); 
				} 
			continue;

That can I do so after the value of "NOMER" is "0", not to show the "\nVALUE: ";
message in the program ? I have a condition, but it shows it yet.

After you read in NOMER, you should check right then whether or not it's zero. Checking four lines later, after you've already done some other stuff, doesn't help.

**Borislav** · 01-09-2011

Well, I understand you but I can't do it properly.

My ideas are here in "pole"
every element to be firstly "1"

Code:

struct ELEM {
    int key2, pole;
    ELEM *left, *right;
} *root1, *root2;

After I make some changes(from the tree to send an element in a queue), "pole" must become '0' ( I have a function called "Available" which makes "pole" equals to "0" .

-----------

I've tried check right after NOMER but ..

Code:

	while (NOMER!=0) 
			{ 
				cout << "\n                       NOMER :"; 
				cin>>NOMER;  
				if (NOMER=0) // here is the check, but not very usable 
					break;				else 
				{
					cout << "\n                       VALUE: ";
					cin>>pol;
					addTREE(NOMER, root1); 
				}
			
			}
			continue;

EDIT : Is it possible pole to be empty and "0" if the tree is in queue ?

**tabstop** · 01-09-2011

There is a difference between NOMER=0 and NOMER==0. You should always make sure you're using the right one for the job. (And you should listen to your compiler, when it says things like "using assignment value for if-condition".)

**Borislav** · 01-11-2011

hey guys,

I'm facing another problem.

First I add elements in a binary tree :

Code:

while(NOMER1!=0)
            { 
				cout << "\n				Landed airplane :";	
				cin>>NOMER1;
				addTREE(NOMER1, root2);;
                
			} 
			continue;

While creating the tree, I do this in the function :

Code:

t->pole = "IN TREE"

After I make a tree, elements can be sent in queue :

Code:

while(k!=0)
			{

			cout << "\n					Airplane for landing : ";
            cin >> k;
		            if(search_iter(root1, k)!=NULL) 
			{
				push(k);
				Available(root1, k); 
			}
			}
			continue;

And it's supposed "AVAILABLE" to change the "pole" cell from "IN TREE" to
"IN QUEUE".

void Available(ELEM * t, int n) {
if (t != NULL) {
t->pole = "IN QUEUE";
Available(t->left, n);
Available(t->right, n);
}
}

but unfortunately it changes EVERY "pole" cell from the tree.

Any ideas how can I change "Available" so to change only particular elements's "pole" cells ?

Thread: 5 times "local function definitions are illegal"

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Similar Threads

Seg Fault in Compare Function

In over my head

Undefined Reference Compiling Error

Calling a Thread with a Function Pointer.

help writing function definitions