Thread: Sorting MyClass

These Changes shouldn't have any effect buy they do !

and now it's not working properly

in main()
Sstring a("ANumber One"); ---> Sstring a("cccc");
Sstring b("BNumber Two"); ---> Sstring a("aaa");
Sstring c("CNumber Three"); ---> Sstring a("bbb");

in add funct
theList.push_front(IN); ---> theList.push_back(IN);

are you sure you want three Sstring variables all called a, rather than one called a, one called b, and one called c????

copy and paste error..thanks


These Changes shouldn't have any effect buy they do !

and now it's not working properly

in main()
Sstring a("ANumber One"); ---> Sstring a("cccc");
Sstring b("BNumber Two"); ---> Sstring b("aaa");
Sstring c("CNumber Three"); ---> Sstring c("bbb");

in add funct
theList.push_front(IN); ---> theList.push_back(IN);

>These Changes shouldn't have any effect buy they do

No, they'd don't. it appears my workaround isn't working. The derived greater<Sstring*> is never being called. It was luck that they last one worked. All I can suggest at the moment is create a list of Sstring's rather than Sstring*'s, or use a more standards compliant compiler.

Sorenson: in your post

Code:

class s
{
public:
	bool operator()(const Sstring* a, const Sstring* b){ 
			return *a < *b; 
		} 
};

class Holder{
	private:
		list<Sstring *> theList;
	
	public:
		void addMe(Sstring *IN){
			theList.push_front(IN);
		}

		void dsp_all(){
			list<Sstring *>::iterator i = theList.begin();
			cout<<endl<<"--TOP--"<<endl<<endl;
			while(i != theList.end()){
				(*i)->dsp();//toStr;
				cout<<endl;
				i++;
			}
			cout<<endl<<"--END--"<<endl;
		}

		void ListSort(){
			cout<<"Holder::ListSort()"<<endl;

			theList.sort(s());
		}

what if you declared an instance of type s to send to list::sort() rather than trying to send the class name itself? Something like this:

Code:

void ListSort(){
			cout<<"Holder::ListSort()"<<endl;

                                                s functionObject;
			theList.sort(functionObject());
		}

Sorry, don't have compiler capable of using STL so can't compile the code myself.

You'll get :

Error E2193 srt2.cpp 63: Too few parameters in call to 's:perator ()(const Sstring *,const Sstring *)'
in function Holder::ListSort()


Other suggestions are extreamly welcomed !!!

Excellent..... I knew there had to be a way.

Can someone explain the
template<>struct std::greater<Sstring*>

for those of us who aren't too sure how it works.

>Can someone explain the
template<>struct std::greater<Sstring*>

It's a specialisation of the pre-defined greater functor provided by the standard library. When defining templates you can specify special cases that will get called if they are instantiated by certain types. As the MSVC 6.0 compiler seemingly refuses to allow user defined functors (or any other standard library functor apart from greater) or function pointers to be used as an argument to std::list::sort(), it is a workaround.

This has little bearing on how your code should work, and wouldn't be necessary on most other C++ compilers (including MSVC 6.0's successor).

#include <algorithm>
#include <functional>

aren't needed for the above code

#include <algorithm>
#include <functional>

aren't needed for the above code

algorithm isn't needed, but functional is for greater and binary_function. As list includes functional you don't have to explicitly include it, but doing so does no harm and it could be argued that it would be beneficial to explicitly include it so that someone reading the code knows you're using something declared in it directly rather than indirectly through a different class/template.