"Stack around the variable 'board' was corrupted" error in this code. But, why!?!

[SamyCode]

This is a simple Tic Tac Toe game that i'm programming just to review some C++ concepts.

 # include <iostream>
# include <string>
# include <iomanip>

using namespace std;


const int ROWS = 2;
const int COLS = 2;
void showBoard ();
int main () {

	

	string playerOneName = "";
	string playerTwoName = "";

	cout << "Player 1, enter your name: ";
	cin >> playerOneName;

	system ("cls");

	cout << "Player 2, enter your name: ";
	cin >> playerTwoName;

	system ("cls");

		cout << "\a\aPlayer 1 name is -> " << playerOneName << endl;
		cout << "Player 2 name is -> " << playerTwoName << endl;

		
		system ("pause");

		showBoard();
		
			system ("pause");

	return 0;

}

void showBoard () 
	
{
	int selection = 0;
	 int rSelection = 0;
	 int cSelection = 0;
	cout << "Here is your board!" << endl;

	
	char board [ROWS][COLS];

	for (int c = 0; c <= ROWS; c++)

	{
		cout << setw (10);
		
		for (int c2 = 0; c2 <= COLS; c2++)
		{
			board [c] [c2] = '*';
			cout << board [c] [c2];
		}
		cout << endl;
	}

	cout << "Press 1 for instructions or 2 for start to play right now!";
	cout << "1 or 2? -> ";
	cin >> selection;

	if (selection == 1)

		cout <<"Do nothing" ;
	else if (selection == 2)

		system ("cls");

	cout << "Enter the number of the Row that you want the ""X"" : ";
	cin >> rSelection;
	cout << "Enter the number of the Column that you want the ""X"" : ";
	cin >> cSelection;

	rSelection -= 1;
	cSelection -= 1;

	board [rSelection][cSelection] = 'x';

	for (int c = 0; c <= ROWS; c++)

	{
		cout << setw (10);
		
		for (int c2 = 0; c2 <= COLS; c2++)
		{
			
			cout << board [c] [c2];
		}
		cout << endl;
	}

	
}

This is just the beginning and this code is not even near of what it should be, I know. HOWEVER, this code suppose to write an "x" in the board, the user indicate the row and the column that he wants. Why then it trows this exception?? -> "Stack around the variable 'board' was corrupted" If I don't break the debugging and I continue, it put the "x" where it should be. I'm missing something?? Please help!!

[cpjust]

	for (int c = 0; c <= ROWS; c++)

	{
		cout << setw (10);
		
		for (int c2 = 0; c2 <= COLS; c2++)

You're writing to elements 0, 1 & 2, but only 0 & 1 exist, so you're corrupting the stack.

[SamyCode]

	for (int c = 0; c <= ROWS; c++)

	{
		cout << setw (10);
		
		for (int c2 = 0; c2 <= COLS; c2++)

You're writing to elements 0, 1 & 2, but only 0 & 1 exist, so you're corrupting the stack.

SURE, because the NULL operator need a space too. Wao man, I just missed that. Thank you so much.

[iMalc]

SURE, because the NULL operator need a space too. Wao man, I just missed that. Thank you so much.

Err what!
There's no such thing as a NULL operator and the actual problem is nothing to do with any kind of dummy value required at the end.

There are two problems:
1. ROWS and COLS shoud both equal 3, not 2.
2. The for-loop should go up to less than ROWS or COLS, not less than or equal to

[VirtualAce]

That error message always means that you have corrupted memory on the stack. Normally this happens when you have overrun the bounds of an array on the stack which is exactly what you did.

[SamyCode]

Err what!
There's no such thing as a NULL operator and the actual problem is nothing to do with any kind of dummy value required at the end.

There are two problems:
1. ROWS and COLS shoud both equal 3, not 2.
2. The for-loop should go up to less than ROWS or COLS, not less than or equal to

Well I don't understand. This two loops suppose to executes the same number of times or not???

for (int c = 0; c <= 2, c++)

and

for (int c = 0; c < 3, c++)

Sorry but I think is the same thing!! Or i'm missing something again!?!

PD. I resolved the error of the stack just by increasing 1 to the size of ROWS and COLS. If it is not for the null operator... where was the error then???

[rags_to_riches]

There's no need for null terminators in integer arrays! The null terminator is a special case for the use of the C string functions.

[SamyCode]

Oh well! I think I got it. There is not such thing as null operator in this case as you said. Is that I declare the ROW size to 2 and that's means that I want an array with two spaces which was 0 & 1. That's the problem. Sorryyyyyy.

[iMalc]

Well I don't understand. This two loops suppose to executes the same number of times or not???

for (int c = 0; c <= 2, c++)

and

for (int c = 0; c < 3, c++)

Sorry but I think is the same thing!! Or i'm missing something again!?!

Well yes, both of those loops loop over the correct range. However, now instead of using hard coded values all over the place, make proper use of a named constant, as a good little programmer would. The following two options loop over the correct range.
There are logically three rows, so ROWS must of course be assigned 3. Now:

	for (int c = 0; c <= ROWS-1; c++)

	for (int c = 0; c < ROWS; c++)

Which one would you prefer to type in? Me, I'd go for the shorter one every time!

[SamyCode]

Well yes, both of those loops loop over the correct range. However, now instead of using hard coded values all over the place, make proper use of a named constant, as a good little programmer would. The following two options loop over the correct range.
There are logically three rows, so ROWS must of course be assigned 3. Now:

	for (int c = 0; c <= ROWS-1; c++)

	for (int c = 0; c < ROWS; c++)

Which one would you prefer to type in? Me, I'd go for the shorter one every time!

You are right man. I understand, I just don't know what I was thinking. Maybe it was too late at night. Thank you all.