memory fault/leak
Can this code have a memory fault/leak?
Code:class A { public: ~A() {} vector<B> b; }; class B { public: ~B() {} map<C, string> c_map; }; Class C { } main() { C c1,c2,c3,c4; B b1,b2; b1.c_map(c1) = "c1"; b1.c_map(c2) = "c2"; b2.c_map(c3) = "c3"; b2.c_map(c4) = "c4"; A *a = new A(); a.b.push_back(b1); a.b.push_back(b2); delete a; }
It doesn't have a memory leak.* Are you asking because of the empty destructor? Destructors of members are still called (automatically after user-defined destructor completes) - you can't change this feature of destructors.
*Because of the use of a dumb pointer and not catching exceptions, this code can (theoretically) leak, should either of the push_back's trigger an exception to be thrown.
I might be wrong.
Quoted more than 1000 times (I hope).Thank you, anon. You sure know how to recognize different types of trees from quite a long way away.
However, it does have at least two syntax errors. Also, your map is either not a standard map, which means there could be memory leaks in there, or you have four more syntax errors.
All the buzzt!
CornedBee
"There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
- Flon's Law
Thank You, anon & Corned Bee, thanks for the reply
