But it's the same loop that does the work for all variants of the classes (unless the code has been changed from what I posted, of course).Originally Posted by iMalc
I think the problem has to do with the range checking (but how it can be 10x slower is a bit surprising).
--
Mats
Compilers can produce warnings - make the compiler programmers happy: Use them!
Please don't PM me for help - and no, I don't do help over instant messengers.
I tried adding #define _SECURE_SCL 0 before all my #include directives too and that got the vector time down by a huge amount, but it was still about 50% higher than the others.
I wonder if there's a difference between VC++ retail vs VC++ express? I no longer have a professional version that I can test it with -- only the express version.
"I am probably the laziest programmer on the planet, a fact with which anyone who has ever seen my code will agree." - esbo, 11/15/2008
"the internet is a scary place to be thats why i dont use it much." - billet, 03/17/2010
i couldn't get it working in VS2005. it worked in VS2008, could just be a bug or something.
Why didn't it work? Compile error or runtime error...?
"I am probably the laziest programmer on the planet, a fact with which anyone who has ever seen my code will agree." - esbo, 11/15/2008
"the internet is a scary place to be thats why i dont use it much." - billet, 03/17/2010
the _SECURE_CTL flag got ignored, so the vector results sucked.
