Does this class look fine?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by matsp

Ah, yes. If a function is not a template or inline, it probably (as in, with very few exceptions) should go in a .cpp file. In this case, I don't see any reason why they should NOT be declared in valid.h, and then implemented in valid.cpp.

--
Mats

---

as in...

Code:

---

// Validate.h

namespace valid
{

        bool driverIDValidator(const std::string& id);

}

// Validate.cpp

#include "Validate.h"

bool valid::driverIDValidator(const std::string& id);
{
        static const boost::regex e("^[0-9]{6}[0-9]{4}[0-9]{3}$");
        return regex_match(id, e);
}

---

??

Yup, something like that.

--
Mats

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by matsp

Yup, something like that.

--
Mats

---

I always get a bit suspicious when some1 gives an answer containing "something like that", but thanks

No suspicion there. It's correct. No problems. No errors.
It's as I would like to call it - "by the book"!