Whoops, you are right: I made a typo error. (Two, actually. For some reason, I first wrote "NULL for NULL specific", then replaced the second "NULL" with "C++" but forgot to replace the first with "0". This NULL business is very strange.)Originally Posted by MarkZWEERS
The problem is that the type says otherwise (NULL is an integer), so we have to wait for nullptr to come into play to avoid getting misled while getting extra readability.Originally Posted by Yarin