Thread: Please explain this functions declaration to me

It is pointing to a whole Patient instance. Through countWeight you can access the id, weight, height and ismale member of that Patient instance. (The name countWeight sounds a bit misleading though.)

Originally Posted by Swerve

Ahh, brilliant!

Within the function's body there is:-

Code:

void WeightLoss(Patient *countWeight)
{
    for(int i = 0;i < MAXPATIENTS; i++)
    {
        if (countWeight[i].ismale == 1)
        {
            countWeight[i].weight = countWeight[i].weight * 90 / 100;
        }
        else
        {
            countWeight[i].weight = countWeight[i].weight * 80 / 100;
        }
    }
}

So countWeight is kind of replacing Patient, it's like a gateway to the rest of the struct.

Thanks for taking the time to explain it, appreciate it

Well, to be precise, countWeight is a badly named variable of the TYPE Patient.

--
Mats

Originally Posted by Swerve

Hi matsp,

Do you mean that the name used isn't a good explanation of what it represents/does.

Like naming var1 var7 when there is only one var. Makes the code difficult to understand, whilst though it doesn't affect how the code works/performs.

Yes. A variable called "countWeight", I would expect to contain a number of weights, or some such, not patient data. It's probably a consequence of a change in the code from what it USED TO DO to what it does now.

If you call your variables Fred, countWeight, x, b32aa or xzascajeaeqasexz doesn't matter one bit to what the code does. Their names are to help YOU know what's going on (and anyone else wishing to read and understand the code, of course), but the compiler would be just as happy if all variables are called a1, a2, a3, a4 etc - it makes no odds - it doesn't understand what it means anyways - as long as the names follow C coding standards, it's fine by the compilers view.

--
Mats