Yeah someone tell me how to define a new data type!!!
Yeah someone tell me how to define a new data type!!!
The only new types you can create are structures (and less frequently unions).
Like so...
And you would create a variable of that type byCode:struct foo { char name[30]; int age; };
Now you can hide some of the detail by using a typedef, but that doesn't create anything new, it just creates a new way to refer to something which already exists.Code:struct foo student; struct foo all_students[100];
The two variables above can be expressed in exactly the same way by doing this...Code:typedef struct foo foo_st;
Code:foo_st student; foo_st all_students[100];
If you dance barefoot on the broken glass of undefined behaviour, you've got to expect the occasional cut.
If at first you don't succeed, try writing your phone number on the exam paper.
A user defined data type must first be declared in a structure.
This is a global declaration. It goes after your #include headers. In main() you can define an instance of the user defined type.Code:struct label { int iNum; doulbe dNum; char cName[20]; };
Code:int main() { struct label sRecord; ... sRecord.iNum = 100; printf("iNum member is %d", sRecord.iNum); _getch(); return 0; }
Last edited by Witch_King; 08-12-2001 at 03:35 PM.
I compile code with:
Visual Studio.NET beta2
That's not exactly what I mean by "new data type".
What I would like to do is to define a data type that is essentially much bigger than a float, double, etc.
So instead of :
float myFloat = 1.0825;
I could do :
greatbig myGreatBigNum = 1.0825857346906234562134567879548743234;
...and so on defining new variables of type "greatbig" as needed.
I could then perform more precise calculations than are possible with C's standard numerical datatypes.
Um?
I didn't type that, I know nothing about C++ programming. Must be an error or something.
-Fool
For some reason, the message board is taking me for someone else!!! I have unwillingly stolen someone elses Identity!!!
This new board has some bugs that are being worked out.
My suggestion to the problem would be to wait for I64 technology which will facilitate new compilers with larger 'built-in' types or 'primitives'. This will happen quite soon.
I compile code with:
Visual Studio.NET beta2
...
Code:#include <cmath> #include <complex> bool euler_flip(bool value) { return std::pow ( std::complex<float>(std::exp(1.0)), std::complex<float>(0, 1) * std::complex<float>(std::atan(1.0) *(1 << (value + 2))) ).real() < 0; }
Are you asking how to making a primitive that is larger than a double? If so..you can't. I have never personally tried this but maybe you can make something like fixed point numbers but use a double for extra bits. But that may be more work than it is worth.
You could create your own data type. If memory isn't a concern you could use a byte sized type (char)for each decimal place, or pack the decimal places within a byte.
You would then have to create your own functions to input/output these values and for adding, subtracting, multiplying etc.
Using this method would be considerably slower than using a primitive so unless you've got a very good reason I wouldn't bother.
I could then perform more precise calculations than are possible with C's standard numerical datatypes.
That's not really possible, as numerical values are never 100% accurate on computers anyway. Using double or long is your best bet for very large values. You won't ever get an exact number even then. I don't see how you could create a new data type that is not specified in C already.
64-bit processing will certainly allow twice the current memory allocation allowed by CPUs, but floating point numbers would still be imprecise (as you have to round of some time or it will continue forever).My suggestion to the problem would be to wait for I64 technology which will facilitate new compilers with larger 'built-in' types or 'primitives'. This will happen quite soon.
the large int case study for AP cs.
you can, but it'll have to be through classes & c++.
.sect signature
> greatbig myGreatBigNum = 1.0825857346906234562134567879548743234;
As I seem to have said this already several times in reply to other posters, I'll just say it again.
No there are no extended data types for numeric data, but there's nothing stopping you implementing a library.
Here's one example
http://www.swox.com/gmp/
If you dance barefoot on the broken glass of undefined behaviour, you've got to expect the occasional cut.
If at first you don't succeed, try writing your phone number on the exam paper.
Geez, I think I might have to give this URL out to my teachers at DeVRY so that they can reccomend students to post their quesitons here.
I compile code with:
Visual Studio.NET beta2
You evil, evil little man.Geez, I think I might have to give this URL out to my teachers at DeVRY so that they can reccomend students to post their quesitons here.
-Govtcheez
[email protected]
