Thread: C89/90 Standard

  1. 01-11-2005 #16
    anonytmouse
    anonytmouse is offline
    Yes, my avatar is stolen anonytmouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    2,544
    Dave, good find, a search on the text in that link brings up this nicely formatted version of the C89 draft.

    Pooper, I'm not sure what the problem is. You could just ignore the annotations in the Schildt book.
  2. 01-11-2005 #17
    the pooper
    the pooper is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    42
    That's exactly what I'm looking for! Thanks guys.
  3. 01-11-2005 #18
    quzah
    quzah is offline
    ATH0 quzah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    14,826
    Quote Originally Posted by anonytmouse
    You could just ignore the annotations in the Schildt book.
    You've got that misworded a bit. Here, let me fix it up for you:

    You should just ignore the entire Schildt book.
    Quzah.
    Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.
  4. 01-11-2005 #19
    swoopy
    swoopy is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    2,934
    Stop Quzah, you're killing me!!! Another classic.
    http://www.freechess.org
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Bug in iterator comparison in C++ standard?
    By steev in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-12-2008, 12:02 AM
  2. Abstract Base Class and References
    By Thantos in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-13-2004, 01:35 PM
  3. im extreamly new help
    By rigo305 in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-23-2004, 11:22 PM
  4. include question
    By Wanted420 in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-17-2003, 03:49 AM
  5. Using c++ standards
    By subdene in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-06-2002, 09:15 AM