Sending Packettes
I made a packette sender for both UDP and TCP and I did it useing two diff methods.
Method 1 use same port to send multi pacs
Method 2 used multi ports to send multi pacs
Question which way is better?
I was just playing with the prog to see what would work. There is an interesting side effect. TIA
More than likely for what you're doing, it doesn't matter. It could matter if you're using a multi-threaded process.
The real issue is if your client (or server) expects or can handle out of order data. If you're using some form of queueing to make sure the end result is as you expect, you should be fine on multiport.
If you're just using a single loop, you probably get no benifit from using multiple ports.
Honestly though, I haven't written anything network intensive, so the above is just my take on it.
Quzah.
Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.
------------------------------------------------------------
Method 1 use same port to send multi pacs
Method 2 used multi ports to send multi pacs
------------------------------------------------------------
In above lines, whether you are telling about ports at destination side or ports at your side ???
Chintan R Naik
packettes
That is the send side. It also opens 2k of ports to listen no matter which way I do it. I how ever found that if I connect to an open port of the recieve test machine the data is recieved. It worked both ways.
Thank You
ps The reason I asked it to see how others do it. I have examined many progs also. Sometimes one has to ask what is not in the prog. ie the reason behind the way in which a prog was written.
psps Hello packette monkeys annonomous....
Last edited by kryptkat; 07-02-2003 at 04:56 PM.
What the hell for?It also opens 2k of ports to listen no matter which way I do it.
Quzah.
Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.
listen on 2k of ports
I have asked that same question a few times.
When I do a netstat there is where and when I see all the ports.
