No it isn't. The first is not incorrect. It's perfectly valid.Originally posted by beely
this statement is wrong ..
>> scanf ("%d",&board->value); //something like that!
correction is ...
>> scanf ("%d",&(board->value));
Quzah.
No it isn't. The first is not incorrect. It's perfectly valid.Originally posted by beely
this statement is wrong ..
>> scanf ("%d",&board->value); //something like that!
correction is ...
>> scanf ("%d",&(board->value));
Quzah.
Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.