Thread: Single pointer allocation of counter and TIme Programming

Do you have a question? What do you mean by "single pointer allocation"?

Also, indentation???

The empty string here is meaningless.

Code:

for (F = 0; ""; F++)

Instead you should leave it blank

Code:

for (F = 0; ; F++)

This is meaningless

Code:

system("0");

This is totally pointless (and the capital C filename suffix suggests you might be compiling this as C++) :

Code:

system("gcc -S 12HOUR_12.C");

There are also errors in your logic.
E.g., start at time 00:00:57 and the next few times are:

Code:

00    : 00    : 58 
00    : 01    : 59    <== should be 00:00:59
00    : 01    : 01    <== should be 00:01:00

E.g., start at time 02:59:57 and the next few times are:

Code:

02    : 59    : 58 
10    : 00    : 59    <== should be 02:59:59
10    : 00    : 01    <== should be 03:00:00

So is F the most significant digit of hours, or the least significant digit of seconds?
Who knows from your alphabet soup.

Pick better variable names.

Code:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
//HH:MM:SS
int main()
{
    int h_tens=0,h_units=0,m_tens=0,m_units=0,s_tens=0,s_units=0,i=0;
    for(s_units=0; ""; s_units++)
    {
        if(s_units==10)
        {
            s_units=0;
            s_tens++;
            if(s_tens==6)
            {
                s_tens=0;
                s_units++;
            }
        }
        if(s_units==9 && s_tens==5)
        {
            m_units=m_units+1;
            if(m_units==10)
            {
                m_units=0;
                m_tens=m_tens+1;
                if(m_tens==6)
                {
                    m_tens=0;
                    h_units=h_units+1;
                    if(h_units==3)
                    {
                        h_units=0;
                        h_tens=h_tens+1;
                        if(h_tens==2)
                        {
                            h_tens=0;
                        }
                    }
                }
            }
        }
        printf("%m_units%m_units    : %m_units%m_units    : %m_units%m_units \n",h_tens,h_units,m_tens,m_units,s_tens,s_units);
        sleep(1);
    }
}

It then becomes immediately obvious that certain things don't make any sense at all.

Such as line 17, where you should be incrementing m_units, not s_units.

The variation of program decides by compiler of each cpu architecture, for(F=0;"";F++) Represent infinite count of numerics or loops 0 to infinity if any blocks appear means the cpu compilation stopped by malloc operation of header file library or standard disassemble operation by the asm code.
its not time code program is just a tool the application architection depend on the code logic thats write. the timer is infinity compilation while compilation of for loop function in asm leading the creation of cpu timer art of time pricols as per all cpu in the world have same timer logic of one second less than speed of real clock but the real clock speed will be calculation of delay of each govt times. the time not run by timer of cpu. the timer is constant for measure time of the speed in all land technology exmple 3d map server ran on time of android library but timer detects the 3d map time delay that happen while aircraft flying on sky.

system("gcc -S 12HOUR_12.C"); Represent the timer validate itself by each time compilation of timer of bios leads the cpu become neutral of all processing units the all arithmetic process in computer ran by timer of bios chip in any architecture each time compilation inside system command call will clearing the each process tlb memory block which represent i protect my system process by my c program compilation one compilation within infinity compilation of each timer count.

Single pointer allocation means the time after 9 second its 10 by odo meter old motor cycle logic if 9 counts increase then 10 will come as count to the asm by disassembler of cpu cache

Clearly it is impossible to communicate with this entity.
It's interesting how pure stupidity and outright mental disease are indistinguishable.

Last edited by sivaraman95; 7 Hours Ago at 08:56 AM. Reason: Clarity

Yes, clearly total nonsense....

Originally Posted by sivaraman95

The variation of program decides by compiler of each cpu architecture...

It's like you put a technical dictionary into a food blender then picked out all the words that were still legible.

It's just keyword soup seasoned with a few buzzwords.

Artificial Idiot?
It responded to the points I made in my post.
I'm pretty sure it's just a nutcase with a layer of ESL obfuscation.

Originally Posted by Yonut

Might this have been created by AI?

Doubtful. I got better results playing around with Markov chains!

This roast is done, sticking a fork in it.