Thread: problem with program

Hello
Whenever user enter any number, then print the five value after the number. like if user enter 2 then program should be print 2,3,4,5,6 and if user enter 4 then program should be print 4,5,6,7,8

there is condition user can enter only number between 0 to 10

Code:

#include<stdio.h>int main (void)
{
 unsigned int i, number;
 
 printf("Enter number %d \n");
 
 scanf("%d",&number);
 
 if(number > 10)
 
 {
  if (i=0; i < 5; i++)
        {   
    printf("\n numbers %d", number);
  }
 }  
  return 0;
}

error: expected ')' before ';' token
if (i=0; i < 5; i++)

What do you think, what's the wrong in program?

Perhaps the keyword "for" is more appropriate than "if" for executing a loop

Also, you probably want to run the loop if the number is <= 10 rather than > 10

Originally Posted by Hodor

Perhaps the keyword "for" is more appropriate than "if" for executing a loop

I got it

Code:

#include<stdio.h>
int main (void)
{
 unsigned int i, number;
 
 printf("Enter number %d \n");
 
 scanf("%d",&number);
 
 if(number <= 10)
 
 {
  for (i=number; i < number+5; i++)
        {   
    printf("\n numbers %d", i);
  }
 }  
  return 0;
}

Enter number 4200784
3
numbers 3
numbers 4
numbers 5
numbers 6
numbers 7

what is 4200784 ?

4200784 is a random number because printf is expecting an integer ("%d") and you didn't supply one

Originally Posted by userxbw

if you're suppose to go up to 10 and if they type 7 and you're doing number + 5, that gives you 12. yes?
then you'll need to rethink your for loop conditional as well, yes?

Where do they say they're only supposed to go up to 10?

Originally Posted by userxbw

Now I am questioning your ability to even understand code, let alone yourself or other humans.
this is called implied

I am seriously wondering why you think that the OP should not print numbers greater than 10.

Originally Posted by userxbw

seriously huh? try not to lose any sleep over it because I'm not, nor was I seriously thinking he couldn't go above 10. Where did you even get that impression? Ridged thinking perhaps, or you have yet to grasp the basic understanding of the difference between a question and a statement, or both? <-- notice the punctuation mark.
I'm done with this conversation. get some professional help with your issues.

I think you may need professional help. This is the completely insane statement you made:

Originally Posted by userxbw

if you're suppose to go up to 10 and if they type 7 and you're doing number + 5, that gives you 12. yes?
then you'll need to rethink your for loop conditional as well, yes?

no?
no?
NOWHERE did anyone say that the output must only go up to 10. You made it up.

Originally Posted by userxbw

and you're an idiot. then why would he even bother to do and if <= 10 if the amount he is running it up to does not matter? you sense of logic and just loving to be a ........y head trying to point out questions I asked to clarify just to try cut me down and make me feel like I'm the idiot for asking questions. Just so you can try to make yourself feel like you're smarter. Why don't you try to show some intelligence instead and go seek help like I said.

you're just proving me right about what I asked you about and you regressed into the most basic sate of denial the first line of defense.

Just like I said you "Ridged thinking (on your part) perhaps, and you have yet to grasp the basic understanding of the difference between a question and a statement, "

You're the only one getting disturbed over it, why is that? The OP is not. He is the only one that actually has rights say something about it, it was to the OP not you, and they are questions, so it does not matter what I said, they were questions, not a statements. Stop being stupid. seriously go get help for your inferiority complex, and go back to school while you're at it.

I don't like school

Originally Posted by userxbw

it shows, nor is it an excuse to NOT self educate yourself in more than just programming.

Read geographic item location data from file and calculate neighbors

post 13, and 14

I invite you to solve the problem of combining the trees where appropriate. See post #1 of the thread you linked to