What framework do you use and why? Thanks. I using TinyCC on Windows.
What framework do you use and why? Thanks. I using TinyCC on Windows.
O_o
What "tinycc" are you talking about? The only one I know is a compiler.
Soma
“Salem Was Wrong!” -- Pedant Necromancer
“Four isn't random!” -- Gibbering Mouther
O_o
Oh, that makes much more sense. I thought you were giving the framework you use.
[Edit]
I don't use a C testing framework because I don't write enough C code.
[/Edit]
Soma
“Salem Was Wrong!” -- Pedant Necromancer
“Four isn't random!” -- Gibbering Mouther
Starting from this list List of unit testing frameworks - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
One that might match your needs is this one https://github.com/imb/fctx
I know nothing about it.
Tim S.
"...a computer is a stupid machine with the ability to do incredibly smart things, while computer programmers are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are,in short, a perfect match.." Bill Bryson
I did not ask what frameworks are found in nature.
I tried it, and its ideology is highly compatible with my style of writing programms. Unfortunately, it works with some bugs in my environment. I had the idea to make my own framework as a simplified subset of FCTX.One that might match your needs is this one https://github.com/imb/fctx
Primarily I'm interested in your personal experience, not idle speculation.I know nothing about it.
You have now been added to my ignore list because you post questions without all the needed info in them.
Tim S.
"...a computer is a stupid machine with the ability to do incredibly smart things, while computer programmers are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are,in short, a perfect match.." Bill Bryson
Lolwut? I asked the question "what framework do you use?"
Then you gave the answer to another question, which I have not asked: "What frameworks are found in the wild?" or "Name of any framework?"
And when I pointed out that I asked another question, you said that my question is incorrect because does not match your answers.
My question: how much is 2 * 2? Your answer: boots. Of course, I'm an idiot, because I had to ask "what is worn on the feet?" Question "how much is 2 * 2?" is senseless, because you are not mathematician, but cobbler. OK. All right.
Well, just don't worry. Will not go away, stay at home, I now call on the Nobel Committee. Don't worry, you don't need a costume. Now another fashion for Nobel Laureates: shirts with long sleeves.
Last edited by zub; 05-25-2014 at 10:29 AM.
O_o
Actually, the question "How much is 2 * 2?" has a definitive answer. You really asked "What are some number you like to multiply?".
The answer given was "I don't like to multiply any particular numbers, but here is a list of number you might like to multiply."
I would have given the same answer after considering the information you added later related to having tried some only to find bugs.
I would have only phrased things a little different: try a bunch and see which you want to use.
I would have given a little lenience on not posting that extra information, but your attitude buys you an entry on my ignore list.
Instead of a Nobel prize, I will take my consideration in the form peanut butter cookies.
Soma
“Salem Was Wrong!” -- Pedant Necromancer
“Four isn't random!” -- Gibbering Mouther
My question has a definitive answer too. What framework do you use? What color is your hair? Where did you learn? Do you like to wear lingerie? All these questions are clear, unambiguous and suggest an answer consisting of a single word: FCTX, green, MIT, yes.Actually, the question "How much is 2 * 2?" has a definitive answer.
What additional information is needed to answer these questions? The length of my penis?
What additional information can be represented as a response? Link to Wikipedia, which explains what the frequency of light we perceive? Or "I do not take any because blind"? And why do I need this information? May be, he begs?
Last edited by zub; 05-26-2014 at 12:07 AM.
Do not you realize how pathetic your attempt? If not, you fool. If yes, you bastard.
Strongly recommend that you read a book on elementary logic, polemical techniques and cognitive distortions. For beginning - Amazon.com: Primarily Logic, Grades 2-4 (9781593631222): Judy Leimbach, Diane Draze, Dean Crawford, Pat Crawford: Books
However, I doubt that this will help you. Teach is much easier than to retrain.The 10-yearboy, that is only read and write, you can teach physics. It is difficult, but possible. But you can't explain the structure of the world to twenty years Mormon, who read only the Bible. His brains are irreversibly damaged. Any attempt to explain to him something logically crashed because it has no logical thinking. A vicious circle.
I am but an ant trying to understand the mountain. Take pity. :P.
I am suggesting to use "cunit" for performing unit test in c.
For more details, please refer CUnit Home
Thanks! Anybody else want to comment on the merits?