Originally Posted by
CommonTater
I've been using PellesC for years, since version 2.90 and across 3 OS upgrades.
Like any complex piece of code we will find the occasional bug. However; Pelle went to work on the compiler and got it pretty much straightened out and nicely keeps on top of reported bugs. It's been 100% reliable for me the whole time...
The big advantage of PellesC over Code::Blocks is the IDE features. If you go with Code::Blocks and MinGW you will need to find your own Resource, Dialog, Icon, Bitmap, String Table and Message Table editors, all of which are included in PellesC from the git-go. (And good luck finding a free standing Message Table editor!)
Plus, what makes you think MinGw is any better than LCC?