Speaking of malloc, guess what malloc returns.
Printable View
Well, the standard does not say that not saying something makes it false, just that the standard doesn't promise it's true. Of course, if you were to do some more in depth analysis (which the standard is not all that interesting) you might be able to demonstrate something logically about a pointer being equivalent to a memory address.
BUT, IMO memory addresses are not really significant in normative C programming. What is significant it the concept of "reference to" an existing entity of some type.
So in other words, you aren't going to tell us what's up.
I don't know what you're problem is specifically with me but I just want to understand what you're talking about. Don't get bent out of shape about what side I'm on, I think you're older than that. I'm simply asking for additional knowledge and if you don't want to share it then kindly don't bring it up in a public forum to brag.
> Maybe when I wake up in the morning, I will see the significance of it.
Actually bub, all you're going to see from now on is 6 letters beginning with 'b'.
Consider this an opportunity to be less overworked.
Bye troll.
Uhh... Am I still in the right thread?
But seriously, could someone give me an answer so I can see where I'm going wrong please?
ÉireKarl, I apologise on behalf of this community for the mess that this thread has become. I am going to close this thread. I suggest that you start a new one with your current question.