Unlike you friend, I have deliberately avoided letting the proletarian anger take the better of me and have argued against your points with refined irony rather than name-calling.Originally Posted by Overworked_PhD
Unlike you friend, I have deliberately avoided letting the proletarian anger take the better of me and have argued against your points with refined irony rather than name-calling.
Actually, I'll extend this same offer to MK27, laserlight (even though I don't like her), and iMalc (even though I'm not that fond of him either).
Don't forget who you're talking about here. Frankly I'm not surprised at all.
Thank you, anon. You sure know how to recognize different types of trees from quite a long way away.
You aren't worthy. Seriously. I'll email you the code that day you make a semi intelligent response on this forum.
What I think is happening is that you are afraid to post your 10liner here and prefer to get some feedback from another member first in order to avoid the subsequent embarrassment.
It's a safety net. Then when they give it to UserX, and UserX says "This is what UserY gave me.", UserY can come along and say "NUH UH!"
Quzah.
Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.
Doh!
Uncylcopedia: Overworked_PhD
No, I would liked to hear unbiased feedback from people have IQs 5 points higher than a chimpanzee. This means that you, Quzah, and that other douche don't get to provide feedback.
Yeah, it's pretty obvious. I smell insecurity.
Overworked_PhD, you have a PM.
I guess that rules you out on reviewing your own code then. What a shame.
Thank you, anon. You sure know how to recognize different types of trees from quite a long way away.
I'm quite curious to see the ANSI C compliant code that is able to produce a factorial solution to n=100 (or higher) in a 32bit system.
Haha. Actually he was complaining a few posts ago that his "IQ dropped by 20 points" meaning it is now negative.
I just read your PM. I'm going to send over the code, along with the explanation, to your email. Just don't post it here.
It's apparent you can't do what you claim. Either you do have 10 lines of C code that compile on a standard compiler, and can produce said 158 digit numbers, or you don't.
Quzah.
Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.
