hi all,
I've a truble with slimilar of this code..
I wrote two equal methog structs usage, but second take it's warning. Why it's happened?Code:struct first *st; struct second *q; func(struct f *s, struct s *ku){ ...... return func(s,ku); } errno=func(q,st); //warning: passing argument 2 of 'func' from incompatible pointer type
because types of parameters are different in 2 calls
All problems in computer science can be solved by another level of indirection,
except for the problem of too many layers of indirection.
– David J. Wheeler
where? I'm not posted any syscalls, or what's calls?Originally Posted by vart
s and q are of types struct f * and struct s * (parameters passed in the line return func(s,ku); )
q and st are of types struct second * and struct first * (passed in the line errno=func(q,st); ) which is different from struct f * and struct s *
All problems in computer science can be solved by another level of indirection,
except for the problem of too many layers of indirection.
– David J. Wheeler
possible I take a mistake in that sapmle. please, can you tell me it more clearly?
there..
Code:struct first *fir; struct second *sec; func(struct firs *fi, struct s *se){ ...... return func(fi,se); // return value from func which take pointer on struct firs and s } errno=func(fir,sec); // take pointer on struct first and second //warning: passing argument 2 of 'func' from incompatible pointer type
struct s != struct sec
--
Mats
Compilers can produce warnings - make the compiler programmers happy: Use them!
Please don't PM me for help - and no, I don't do help over instant messengers.
ok, what I should do so as to improve this?
I want to input two structs into func.
there is nothing to improve. You should decide what type parameters of the function are and provide exactly that type of variables
All problems in computer science can be solved by another level of indirection,
except for the problem of too many layers of indirection.
– David J. Wheeler
