>> an int is actually twice as big as a pointer.
That's backwards. The int is 32bits and the pointer is 64bits.
>> Could this explain the pointer weirdness?
Yep.
gg
>> an int is actually twice as big as a pointer.
That's backwards. The int is 32bits and the pointer is 64bits.
>> Could this explain the pointer weirdness?
Yep.
gg
Well, it's not as though we hadn't done this before (towards the end of the thread).Originally Posted by happyclown
You almost got it 100% right.
But that's what makes tabstop 85%-90% awesome.
I feel younger in that picture!
You know, I hate to get snippy with poor 'ol tabstop, but you have just presented a great piece of evidence to support my previous accusation ;0
C programming resources:
GNU C Function and Macro Index -- glibc reference manual
The C Book -- nice online learner guide
Current ISO draft standard
CCAN -- new CPAN like open source library repository
3 (different) GNU debugger tutorials: #1 -- #2 -- #3
cpwiki -- our wiki on sourceforge
