Yes, but that is AFTER you called strcpy(). My point was that if we assume that you replace strcpy() with something that actually copies array into copy, it would still contain garbage, since array has NOT YET been filled with something - it contains whatever happens to be in that location of memory [1], and it's very unlikely that this matches your random number sequence.
[1] Some compilers will actually fill unused memory with a recognisable pattern so that we can "see" that the memory has not been filled in, but the content is still not what you would like to have, so it's pretty irrelevant really.
--
Mats