> but could we plz consentrate on the looping as i described before that is what I really need. thanx
We!?! It's your work, at least attempt it -- don't make demands, this isn't group work.
Printable View
> but could we plz consentrate on the looping as i described before that is what I really need. thanx
We!?! It's your work, at least attempt it -- don't make demands, this isn't group work.
have you read this: http://faq.cprogramming.com/cgi-bin/...&id=1043284385 ?
. . . and this? http://www.cprogramming.com/tutorial/c/lesson3.html
Appreciate the effort, but wouldn't an expression with a relational or logical operator be a larger expression instead of what you said? "that && the_other_thing" would be as much a conditional test as a variable by itself (though that's not very expressive, the fact remains). The sides of a relational operator are usually called operands, too. So, yeah ....
Heh, well, we aren't perfect. Take it with a bit of criticism. It's not 100% correct.
Just do your homework next time, I guess.
Words and expressions can't always be remembered :p
It was a nice explanation in that it was accurate at least to a degree (although while the groups were marked with inproper words) :)
If 'ifs' and 'buts' were candies and nuts, we'd all be having a Merry Christmas. :p