And he forgot to declare hack(). I'm turning my computer off just in case though.
And he forgot to declare hack(). I'm turning my computer off just in case though.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
It's the intent that matters, twomers.
What's funny though is I was thinking exactly the same thing -- about Send.Virus, I mean.
[edit]Eh -- what? You mean, prototype Hack() (not hack())? [/edit]And he forgot to declare hack(). I'm turning my computer off just in case though.
dwk
Seek and ye shall find. quaere et invenies.
"Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it." -- Alan Perlis
"Testing can only prove the presence of bugs, not their absence." -- Edsger Dijkstra
"The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing." -- John Powell
Other boards: DaniWeb, TPS
Unofficial Wiki FAQ: cpwiki.sf.net
My website: http://dwks.theprogrammingsite.com/
Projects: codeform, xuni, atlantis, nort, etc.
prototype Hack(), yes.
Look, I should have turned my computer off by now.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
You don't have to prototype functions, in C at least. You might get warnings, but hey.
It's not C or C++, it's 1337! -- or was that lolcode?
dwk
Seek and ye shall find. quaere et invenies.
"Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it." -- Alan Perlis
"Testing can only prove the presence of bugs, not their absence." -- Edsger Dijkstra
"The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing." -- John Powell
Other boards: DaniWeb, TPS
Unofficial Wiki FAQ: cpwiki.sf.net
My website: http://dwks.theprogrammingsite.com/
Projects: codeform, xuni, atlantis, nort, etc.
Ah. Bummer. He's clearly smarter than I am
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
You don't think... remember the recent (last year), site down time? You don't think...
OMG! You think?
I think, I think too.
ps: I really need to do something better with my time
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
I think I can, I think I can, I think I can...
I knew I could.
(You know it's bad when you start quoting Thomas the Tank Engine...)
Haha, yeah he's got a lot of bugs in that bit of code.Originally Posted by twomers
How productive of us all.
This thread has ended peacefully.
Why? It just makes him advertise the fact what a fool he is.
@ 'Awesome Hacker man': If you want to bash someone, don't try and bash an admin -- I find Elysia is a good person to bash instead
Last edited by zacs7; 02-02-2008 at 09:04 PM.
lol that's not nice, Elysia is a good person who helps peopleWhy? It just makes him advertise the fact what a fool he is.
@ 'Awesome Hacker man': If you want to bash someone, don't try and bash an admin -- I find Elysia is a good person to bash instead
I'm not saying that's being picky, I'm just going by history that has nothing to do with this.Mentioning keyloggers and things of that nature is clearly stated as being against the rules. I hardly see how that's picky.
You can't go by that. This is a simple fix...his virus sending method is the wrong way around, surely, and doesn't call a function... just states something without a ;. I think we're safe.
Code:#define Virus virus_to(UserPort);
>> lol that's not nice, Elysia is a good person who helps people
Yes and you eat babies.
Since this thread is going nowhere (or is it?)...
I changed my avatar for a colorful one. I don't know if it looks good or if it looks horrible.
