Thread: Open Standards

  1. #1
    and the hat of int overfl Salem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    The edge of the known universe
    Posts
    39,659

    Open Standards

    Various narrow interest groups are seeking to manipulate open standards to favour their own view of the world.

    http://www.noooxml.org/start
    Sign the petition.

    I mean, how can something like "autoSpaceLikeWord95" be in an ISO standard. What else is in there, 8.3 filename support?

    And what's with all the promises of "not to sue". It sounds just like a promise of "not to bite" from a cobra. You just know that isn't going to work in the long run.

    When (eventually) Microsoft is no more, or it decides that it is no longer in it's economic interest to support this, then everything which uses this will find itself up the creek without a paddle.
    Microsoft lives and dies by it's continual churn in file formats. There is no reason to think they won't tinker with this, or abandon it.

    A true open standard should be implementable by anybody, for perpetuity.
    Not by one company for as long as it is beneficial to them.

    In the same vein, EU residents might want to mozey over to here as well.
    http://openstandards.wikidot.com/main-en
    If you dance barefoot on the broken glass of undefined behaviour, you've got to expect the occasional cut.
    If at first you don't succeed, try writing your phone number on the exam paper.

  2. #2
    Crazy Fool Perspective's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,640
    ...and signed. Lets just hope that flaming piece of crap doesn't get through.

  3. #3
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Signed on http://openstandards.wikidot.com/main-en

    Although I doubt Gartner's report will pass. EU has been traditionally against such views.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Open Source Licenses
    By Mario F. in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-10-2006, 08:53 PM
  2. Big help in Astar search code...
    By alvifarooq in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-24-2004, 11:38 AM
  3. Unknown Memory Leak in Init() Function
    By CodeHacker in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-09-2004, 09:54 AM
  4. Problems with open and save boxes
    By pinkcheese in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-21-2002, 06:03 PM
  5. Ghost in the CD Drive
    By Natase in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-12-2001, 05:38 PM