Because there is not enough evidence to prosecute?

Prahaps Libby's lies to the grand jury clouded the issue enough to ensure that there would never be enough hard evidence to prosecute.

I think Libby was give a harsh sentance (30 months compared to Martha Stewarts 5 months) because of this.

Quote Originally Posted by Dave_Sinkula
Stalin, among others, had show trials too. Those folks had an opportunity to 'defend' themselves.
Under the current administration we have had CIA renditions (kidnappings), outsourced torture and indefinite imprisonment without charge.

You have sham trials at Gitmo. Where after nearly 6 years wait 2/3 of your lawyers are kicked out before the trial begins, (because they are not US based) the rules change mid way thru ect, ect.

So why not?