December 24, 2006
December 25, 2006
December 26, 2006
December 27, 2006
December 28, 2006
December 29, 2006
December 30, 2006
December 31, 2006
January 1, 2007
January 2, 2007
January 3, 2007
January 4, 2007
January 5, 2007
January 6, 2007
January 7, 2007
The time is drawing near, so let's have a little game of it. This is about all we have to go on:"The rough estimate is January 5th."The ground rules:
- Guess what day the baby will be born (the poll had a maximum of 15 options).
- What time of day it will be born [edit](local time)[/edit].
- And the weight and length (I'd prefer pounds & ounces and inches).
- Whether it’s a boy or a girl.
Summary:
Last edited by Dave_Sinkula; 11-22-2006 at 07:49 PM. Reason: Updated summary.
7. It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.
40. There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.*
- Jan 3
- 4:30 AM
- 9 lbs., 3ozs. [edit]21 in.[/edit]
- Boy
7. It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.
40. There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.*
My wife's pick:
- Dec 22
- 3:35 PM
- 7 lbs., 3ozs., 19-1/4 in.
- Girl
7. It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.
40. There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.*
Is your wife experienced in child birth? Cause I think she should be disqualified for insider information.Originally Posted by Dave_Sinkula
Sent from my iPad®
>Yep, this news very much came out of left field.
The VIPs have been privy to it for some time now.
My best code is written with the delete key.
Ahem... don't you mean *most* of the VIPs? Eheh... heh...
Prelude's gonna be a mommy!
Sent from my iPad®
Here's the "insider" "information":
So my wife took a standard two week combined handicap for a first girl.
- The first baby comes early.
- Girls come early.
I am guessing boy, for no real reason, so I went with bigger and later.
At this point I doubt she's dropped yet, and I sincerely doubt we'd see a picture to see how she's carrying anyway -- so lacking gender hints the rest is just really a guess. But there is some fun in that.
There. Now we can argue about these myths/common wisdoms/wives tales I presented too.
7. It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.
40. There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.*
Wha? You mean Prelude won't be posing nude a la Cover Girl style on the cover of next month's Vanity Fair?
Sent from my iPad®
> What time of day it will be born.
Is this local time or GM time?
- Dec 31
- 3am (local)
- 8lb 3oz
- Boy
If you dance barefoot on the broken glass of undefined behaviour, you've got to expect the occasional cut.
If at first you don't succeed, try writing your phone number on the exam paper.
I didn't even know Prelude was pregnant.
So I'll bet instead (no offense meant).
- January, 2
- 16:50
- 7.5 lbs
- 19.5 inches
- A baby girl! What else? I bet Prelude's X chromosome planted a warning sign outside against any intruders.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
1) January 5th
2) 23:59
3) 7.2 pounds
4) Girl
Congratulations, Prelude!
January 7th
3:48pm local time
8 lbs, 10 oz. [edit]19 3/4"[/edit]
Girl
Last edited by Decrypt; 11-12-2006 at 02:09 PM.
There is a difference between tedious and difficult.
Yep, this news very much came out of left field.
Jan. 5 (I suspect Prelude's baby to be very punctual)
5:21 AM EST
8lbs, 5oz.
Boy
Sent from my iPad®
Tee hee somebody had sex.
I'm not immature, I'm refined in the opposite direction.
lol...
