Thread: We have posts in the future

  1. #1
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446

    We have posts in the future

    The forums are a little wacked. What happened? Posts with dates of tomorow, today posts being sent to the bottom of the page, not being able to Mark Forums Read....
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  2. #2
    & the hat of GPL slaying Thantos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    5,681
    Works fine more me. PEBKAC

  3. #3
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    I wish it was PEBKAC. But regional settings are correct, DST is correctly set too and my local system times (just in case) are correct too. I deleted cookies just in case... but the same.

    It's currently 22:02 GMT, November 4th.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  4. #4
    Registered User jlou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,090
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario F.
    The forums are a little wacked. What happened? Posts with dates of tomorow, today posts being sent to the bottom of the page, not being able to Mark Forums Read....
    If you notice in the bugs and strange things sticky thread where forum bugs and strange things are usually posted, somebody complained about the forum time being incorrect. Apparently it was advanced by 12 hours, and apparently it has now been fixed. Of course, that fix would be to set it back twelve hours, so for the following twelve hours from the fix there will be posts marked with a future time/date, and some of the posts will show up higher in the threads than posts they quote.

  5. #5
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Ok. That explains it. Thanks.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. ( posts per day)
    By dwks in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-05-2008, 12:53 AM
  2. Future of C++ and Windows Programming :: C++
    By kuphryn in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-26-2003, 09:53 AM
  3. Future Value
    By KathyMc in forum C Programming
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-14-2003, 10:50 AM
  4. Most Posts per Day
    By Garfield in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 11-08-2001, 10:30 AM