View Poll Results: Do you agree that the code tag checking script should be restored

Voters
59. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    53 89.83%
  • No

    6 10.17%

Thread: Please restore the code tag checking script

  1. #46
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    A few hints could also be helpful. Some clearly visible text on the new thread page reminding everyone of code tags and probably also move the two tag buttons to a more prominent position.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  2. #47
    The superhaterodyne twomers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    2,273
    I think we can agree that someone with about 100 posts will use tags, right? I think something like this may go down well -

    Use an if statement or something to either put this up or not, depending on the user's competancy ...

    Attachment 6734

    What'dee think? Whose with me to create accounts to fix the poll, only joking, mods

  3. #48
    and the hat of int overfl Salem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    The edge of the known universe
    Posts
    39,661
    I have a new idea - those who voted "no" will be watched carefully for any violation of the code tagging rules. I'm not going to tag such code, I'm going to delete it with a suitable Quzah-esqe remark.

    I'm not impressed by the whining about whether one could post a brace in prose because the script was extensively tested and found to be far more useful than annoying.
    If you dance barefoot on the broken glass of undefined behaviour, you've got to expect the occasional cut.
    If at first you don't succeed, try writing your phone number on the exam paper.

  4. #49
    Registered User Rennor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem
    I have a new idea - those who voted "no" will be watched carefully for any violation of the code tagging rules.
    I just wish that the voting data structure / table relation does not have relation between voter and vote item. Usually anonymity is preserved by only defining who has voted, but not what was voted.

    Apart from that, people behind the scenes here are most probably all professionals and believing the script is properly tested is quite easy. Maybe my vote was misplaced, please have mercy on my soul...

  5. #50
    Ethernal Noob
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,901
    Quote Originally Posted by Rennor
    I just wish that the voting data structure / table relation does not have relation between voter and vote item. Usually anonymity is preserved by only defining who has voted, but not what was voted.

    Apart from that, people behind the scenes here are most probably all professionals and believing the script is properly tested is quite easy. Maybe my vote was misplaced, please have mercy on my soul...
    Click on "view poll results"

    SURPRISE!

  6. #51
    The superhaterodyne twomers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    2,273
    Who said CBoard was a democracy, Rennor? Do you remember voting for leaders? If not, then why should anonymity be an issue

    Edit - I wonder if this thread will get closed if it goes off topic ... Don't hurt me
    Last edited by twomers; 08-18-2006 at 06:36 AM.

  7. #52
    Anti-Poster
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Rennor
    To go beyond the topic about forum looks... You all should also look at your signature. [rant on sigs]
    If you don't like it, don't view them. Under Edit Options > Thread Display Options:
    If I did your homework for you, then you might pass your class without learning how to write a program like this. Then you might graduate and get your degree without learning how to write a program like this. You might become a professional programmer without knowing how to write a program like this. Someday you might work on a project with me without knowing how to write a program like this. Then I would have to do you serious bodily harm. - Jack Klein

  8. #53
    Ethernal Noob
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,901
    "I want these motha *#$&in noobs of this motha *#$&in board!"[/sammyjack]

  9. #54
    Lurking whiteflags's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    9,612
    > When someone posts code without tags, an alert box comes up, saying "No tags, people are likely to ignore your post because of it. Want to auto tag, put tags yoursefl, or no tags"

    That message is entirely too long! Newbies don't like to read!

  10. #55
    System Novice siavoshkc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Tehran
    Posts
    1,246
    Let me ask something, tagging is a law that is going to be forced? If so do whatever you want. Why polling?

    Maybe I don't want to tag my code for some reason. If you don't like it, don't read it and don't post any answer. It is up to me to make the post readable so others can help me.
    Learn C++ (C++ Books, C Books, FAQ, Forum Search)
    Code painter latest version on sourceforge DOWNLOAD NOW!
    Download FSB Data Integrity Tester.
    Siavosh K C

  11. #56
    Lurking whiteflags's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    9,612
    We're polling to demonstrate the need for the code tag script. Other people read the board, and it looks fairly more professional to present something people can read. There are other boards that automatically preserve spacing with those &# non-breaking space things, but this board doesn't do that.

    > Let me ask something, tagging is a law that is going to be forced?
    It's not necessarily a law, at least, I think that is the wrong way to look at it. Earlier versions of the board had a script that checked for code tags: when triggered it would display a harmless message box, and nothing crazy like a ban. When we upgraded recently, somebody forgot to put the script back, but nobody cared until we were slammed with illegible posts.
    Last edited by whiteflags; 08-18-2006 at 11:21 AM.

  12. #57
    and the hat of int overfl Salem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    The edge of the known universe
    Posts
    39,661
    > Maybe I don't want to tag my code for some reason
    I can't think of one.

    No, wait, yes I can - just watch this!
    Check your sig and tell me again what possible lame-assed reason you could possibly have for posting code without code tags.

    Unless it's because you're a stupid pig-ignorant illiterati who can't be arsed to read the rules !!!!
    If you dance barefoot on the broken glass of undefined behaviour, you've got to expect the occasional cut.
    If at first you don't succeed, try writing your phone number on the exam paper.

  13. #58
    carry on JaWiB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,972
    We could all just change our sigs like quzah
    "Think not but that I know these things; or think
    I know them not: not therefore am I short
    Of knowing what I ought."
    -John Milton, Paradise Regained (1671)

    "Work hard and it might happen."
    -XSquared

  14. #59
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    You can feel the warmth of this topic... or is it heat?

    The most sensible thing to do is to actually be offensive when discussing code tags. I'm touched.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  15. #60
    System Novice siavoshkc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Tehran
    Posts
    1,246
    Earlier versions of the board had a script that checked for code tags: when triggered it would display a harmless message box, and nothing crazy like a ban. When we upgraded recently, somebody forgot to put the script back, but nobody cared until we were slammed with illegible posts.
    Was this script efficient? If it was, and it was harmless, again why polling? Put it back. No? It wasn't efficient, don't.

    Unless it's because you're a stupid pig-ignorant illiterati who can't be arsed to read the rules !!!!
    So its a rule and you want to force it. Why polling?

    [edit]

    Please close this thread for the sake of democracy (and before Salem kicks me out of the forum for voting no).
    Last edited by siavoshkc; 08-18-2006 at 11:56 AM.
    Learn C++ (C++ Books, C Books, FAQ, Forum Search)
    Code painter latest version on sourceforge DOWNLOAD NOW!
    Download FSB Data Integrity Tester.
    Siavosh K C

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. checking for a code in a string
    By shin_ono in forum C Programming
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-01-2008, 02:04 AM
  2. Looking for Code Analysis / Checking Tool
    By nvoigt in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-01-2007, 03:34 AM
  3. Obfuscated Code Contest
    By Stack Overflow in forum Contests Board
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 01-21-2005, 04:17 PM
  4. Binary Search Trees Part III
    By Prelude in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-02-2004, 03:00 PM
  5. file existance checking /w code
    By Shadow in forum C Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-08-2002, 02:40 PM