When you factor in retirements, people moving around, and migration to tech jobs, I'm sure that's much much smaller. It's not like they'd just let all the people go because they're reducing pollution; they still need them to build things. Extrapolating hundreds of thousands of lost jobs using that method is extremely faulty.
Besides, I never said I thought we should sign it. I don't know enough about it to make that statement. In fact, I implied that I thought we shouldn't in my previous post. I just said we should make steps to reduce our emissions.
