Thread: *** pointer madness revisited

let's see the civil war

generally, I declare one variable/line, so I declare them like:

Code:

type*var;

but if I'm listing on line line,

Code:

type *var,var,var,*var,var;

and in that line I point out why the other two cases are just wrong.

for the people that want to get into it (I don't): you're not declaring a type of pointer, you're declaring a pointer to a type. the "var" in your example is the pointer, so it should get the '*'. giving the '*' to the type makes it look like you're trying to say that the type is a pointer to a type, when what you really mean to say is that it's a pointer to a type.

and civil wars aren't civil:

Code:

#include<iostream>

int main()
{
	int a,*b,**c,***d,****e;
	b=&a;
	c=&b;
	d=&c;
	e=&d;
	****e=0;
	std::cout<<a<<'\n'<<*b<<'\n'<<**c<<'\n'<<***d<<'\n'<<****e<<std::endl;
	return 0;
}

yeah, I don't know what that had to do with anything, either.

This was just done - this is pointless.
http://cboard.cprogramming.com/showthread.php?t=68768