Thread: Relativity

  1. #1
    S Sang-drax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Göteborg, Sweden
    Posts
    2,072

    Relativity

    Let's say we have a ball and a hole. The ball is slightly larger than the hole, so it won't fit.

    Now we throw the ball at an enormous speed direclty towards the hole. What happens?

    (i) (From a person standing beside the hole's POV)
    The ball is slightly smaller than the hole and will pass through.

    (ii) (From a person standing on the ball's POV)
    The hole is much smaller than the ball, so it'll crash when it arrives.


    What will happen?
    Last edited by Sang-drax : Tomorrow at 02:21 AM. Reason: Time travelling

  2. #2
    C++ Witch laserlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    28,413
    The ball's mass increases drastically leading to an increase in size so it covers the whole hole and more?
    Quote Originally Posted by Bjarne Stroustrup (2000-10-14)
    I get maybe two dozen requests for help with some sort of programming or design problem every day. Most have more sense than to send me hundreds of lines of code. If they do, I ask them to find the smallest example that exhibits the problem and send me that. Mostly, they then find the error themselves. "Finding the smallest program that demonstrates the error" is a powerful debugging tool.
    Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

  3. #3
    Unregistered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    25
    What will be the point of view of a person standing between ball and hole?

  4. #4
    Mayor of Awesometown Govtcheez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    8,823
    > The ball's mass increases drastically leading to an increase in size so it covers the whole hole and more?

    Just because it increases in mass doesn't mean it gets larger.

  5. #5
    C++ Witch laserlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    28,413
    Just because it increases in mass doesn't mean it gets larger.
    That's why I assumed that it does.
    On second thought, maybe there is negligible increase in mass, but instead the ball burns up and the little that's left of it passes through the hole.
    hmmm....
    Quote Originally Posted by Bjarne Stroustrup (2000-10-14)
    I get maybe two dozen requests for help with some sort of programming or design problem every day. Most have more sense than to send me hundreds of lines of code. If they do, I ask them to find the smallest example that exhibits the problem and send me that. Mostly, they then find the error themselves. "Finding the smallest program that demonstrates the error" is a powerful debugging tool.
    Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

  6. #6
    The Earth is not flat. Clyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    1,403
    What will happen?
    I have no idea, but be sure to post the answer when you find out.
    Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem

  7. #7
    S Sang-drax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Göteborg, Sweden
    Posts
    2,072
    Quote Originally Posted by frrossk
    What will be the point of view of a person standing between ball and hole?
    The position doesn't matter, only the relative speed to the ball.

    Quote Originally Posted by frrossk
    The ball's mass increases drastically leading to an increase in size so it covers the whole hole and more?
    No.
    Last edited by Sang-drax : Tomorrow at 02:21 AM. Reason: Time travelling

  8. #8
    & the hat of GPL slaying Thantos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    5,681
    Well you said that the ball is slightly larger then the hole. If its thrown with enough force and if its thrown accuractly then the force of the ball hitting the hole's edges would be enough to reshape the ball so that it would fit through the hole. Once it was through the hole the ball would return to its native shape.

  9. #9
    Cat without Hat CornedBee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    8,895
    In any case, it has nothing to do with relativity. Oh, and the person between ball and hole will get the ball in the face.
    All the buzzt!
    CornedBee

    "There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
    - Flon's Law

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    313
    The ball will fit through the hole, because as it goes faster, it elongates and thins out.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    2,212
    perspective != relativity

  12. #12
    C++ Witch laserlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    28,413
    perspective != relativity
    Sang-drax might be thinking of frames of reference, but I'm not exactly very strong in the concepts involved in relativity to comment with any authority on it anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bjarne Stroustrup (2000-10-14)
    I get maybe two dozen requests for help with some sort of programming or design problem every day. Most have more sense than to send me hundreds of lines of code. If they do, I ask them to find the smallest example that exhibits the problem and send me that. Mostly, they then find the error themselves. "Finding the smallest program that demonstrates the error" is a powerful debugging tool.
    Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

  13. #13
    S Sang-drax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Göteborg, Sweden
    Posts
    2,072
    OK, I think I've figured something out.
    If the ball travels perpendicularly towards the hole, the ball will only look shorter in the direction of motion to the observer. The ball will look like somebody sat on it.
    Same for the hole.

    Thus, both observers will agree on the size of the ball in the other dimensions and it still won't fit.

    Sounds reasonable.

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian
    perspective != relativity
    No, but things will look different from different points of view. Events can even be happening in different order, depending on your relative speed to the objects you study.
    Last edited by Sang-drax; 02-10-2005 at 01:28 PM.
    Last edited by Sang-drax : Tomorrow at 02:21 AM. Reason: Time travelling

  14. #14
    Registered User major_small's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,787
    who cares? stop trying to put the square peg in the round hole... the solution is simple: make the hole bigger or the ball smaller.

    either way, if the ball is malleable enough, and the force is constant, the ball will elongate into an ellipse and fit through the hole, but as you said, the ball is 'thrown' at the hole, so now it comes down to time. if the ball has enough time to regain it's shape by the time it hits the wall, it will hit the wall. if the ball gets to the hole before it regains it's shape, it'll get through.
    Join is in our Unofficial Cprog IRC channel
    Server: irc.phoenixradio.org
    Channel: #Tech


    Team Cprog Folding@Home: Team #43476
    Download it Here
    Detailed Stats Here
    More Detailed Stats
    52 Members so far, are YOU a member?
    Current team score: 1223226 (ranked 374 of 45152)

    The CBoard team is doing better than 99.16% of the other teams
    Top 5 Members: Xterria(518175), pianorain(118517), Bennet(64957), JaWiB(55610), alphaoide(44374)

    Last Updated on: Wed, 30 Aug, 2006 @ 2:30 PM EDT

  15. #15
    Toaster Zach L.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    2,686
    Uhh... Been a bit since I've done relativity, but shouldn't the ball only "deform" in the direction it is traveling. (And no, it won't turn into an ellipse and thin out.)

    So, if it's going straight for the hole ("straight" meaning directly at some projection of it -- i.e. at an angle would work so long as the trajectory takes it through the hole), then it should make it through so long as it would under non-relativistic circumstances. If it isn't on a trajectory that goes through the hole, it has bigger problems to worry about.
    The word rap as it applies to music is the result of a peculiar phonological rule which has stripped the word of its initial voiceless velar stop.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Is this really true or it's just science fiction?
    By Nutshell in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 145
    Last Post: 04-09-2002, 06:17 PM