Anyone watching it? comments?
I find it very hard to believe that a country would even allow the posibility of restricted access to their founding documents and constitution.
Anyone watching it? comments?
I find it very hard to believe that a country would even allow the posibility of restricted access to their founding documents and constitution.
if a contradiction was contradicted would that contradition contradict the origional crontradiction?
I find it hard to believe there's anything special about HANNITY or colmes
-Govtcheez
[email protected]
Originally Posted by Govtcheez
some entropy with that sink? entropysink.com
there are two cardinal sins from which all others spring: Impatience and Laziness. - franz kafka
He's right. Hannity's far too moderate for me.
there was a good crack about them on the late late show last night - kinda too dirty for cboard though
some entropy with that sink? entropysink.com
there are two cardinal sins from which all others spring: Impatience and Laziness. - franz kafka
I'll take that as a no?
It was a long live show with several special guests about a lawsuit filed about the use of the constituion and declaration of independance being used in the school(because of vague referances to god..."endowed by our creator" etc.).
if a contradiction was contradicted would that contradition contradict the origional crontradiction?
SomethingAwful.com actually had this as a DnD topic:use of the constituion and declaration of independance being used in the school(because of vague referances to god..."endowed by our creator" etc.).
http://forums.somethingawful.com/sho...readid=1348956
Some of the stuff can be discredited, but a lot of facts about the case are talked about indepth. This case is not as clear cut as some would like you to believe. I did not watch the episode of Hannity and Colmes, would you like to elaborate on whether they covered the issues raised in the link above?
hmm.... depending on your meaning of the word "special", I would be inclined to disagree with you.I find it hard to believe there's anything special about HANNITY or colmes
EDIT: *For those who do not wish to sort through the link I posted*
In summary: this is a teacher who already had a precedence of being the stereotypical religious "whack-job". In addition to providing the documents, he was trying to use those documents to spark a conversation regarding the religious views of those founders. That is, or should be, the reason he is being reprimanded for his conduct.
Last edited by EvBladeRunnervE; 12-09-2004 at 02:04 AM.
there used to be something here, but not anymore
> hmm.... depending on your meaning of the word "special", I would be inclined to disagree with you.
In this case, you can substitute "positive" for "special", if you'd like.
-Govtcheez
[email protected]
It was not present it in that way...In summary: this is a teacher who already had a precedence of being the stereotypical religious "whack-job". In addition to providing the documents, he was trying to use those documents to spark a conversation regarding the religious views of those founders. That is, or should be, the reason he is being reprimanded for his conduct.
the main arguement going on was whether or not our founding documents should be used in school.
You ever notice that Colmes likes to touch people alot...hmm.... depending on your meaning of the word "special", I would be inclined to disagree with you.
if a contradiction was contradicted would that contradition contradict the origional crontradiction?
