Who do you think....(2008)

**Zach L.** · 11-07-2004

Hmm... Then Jeb Bush could run after her term... Then we'd need to find another Clinton to keep the cycle going.

**RoD** · 11-07-2004

The country will only get worse. I think guilliani would be an awsome president, but i feel the same about nadar.

**Govtcheez** · 11-07-2004

> The country will only get worse. I think guilliani would be an awsome president, but i feel the same about nadar

Nader was only running as ego masturbation; there's no way he could think he would have actually made a difference in this. He was ........ed because no one had paid attention to him in the last 20 minutes and decided he needed to be in the limelight.

I'd like to see which of your views Giuliani and Nader share positions on. They seem like pretty disparate candidates to choose.

**RoD** · 11-07-2004

I agree with nadar. He got used to having a fair amount of weight and now hes a "crying little political biotch baby" (howard stern).

Even if giuliani didnt agree with me on much i still think hed be an awsome preident. I mean, would you want a pres that agreed with rod? think about that lol.

**Govtcheez** · 11-07-2004

> Even if giuliani didnt agree with me on much i still think hed be an awsome preident.

Why?

**PJYelton** · 11-07-2004

Having Hillary as the democratic nominee seems way too risky IMO. While it might draw more women voters, it also might scare away an equal number or even more male voters. Democrats will be so desparate to get into the white house in 2008 that I'd be surprised if they took such a chance. But then again maybe thats just the kind of gamble they need.

**Govtcheez** · 11-07-2004

Or maybe that's the kind of retarded move the current DNC leadership would make.

**Zach L.** · 11-07-2004

They actively seek to make life hard for themselves.

**RoD** · 11-07-2004

>>why

because imo hes very level headed, fair, and makes very good, responsible decisions. He'd be reserved but enforcing, if that makes any sense to anyone but me.

**Govtcheez** · 11-07-2004

No, it makes sense. I was just wondering why you'd vote for someone who's apparently got very different views than you. And now I see

**RoD** · 11-07-2004

Yea my views are often filled with ignorance, misguidence, stupidity, and anger. Not what you'd want to lead the country. Hes fair, so he would consider the views of those like me, and hes intelligent enough to explain why were wrong, or agree if were right.

**VirtualAce** · 11-07-2004

The Democratic party needs to re-evaluate their agenda and their approach. Based on not just the Presidential election but the others as well, they are losing power quickly. While not a Demo myself I think the real issue with them resides in leadership and advertising. They need to stand firm on their platform and stop pandering to this and that. I know that every party and politician panders, but the Demos seem to do it a lot. I think that is where they are losing people but I could be wrong.

Either way they need to figure it out quickly or they won't be in power in 2008. I think they realize that too....or maybe they don't and will keep trying the same old stuff that hasn't worked since Clinton left office.

**xddxogm3** · 11-07-2004

i see Hilary (Pres. Canidate) with Powell (VP. Canidate) or Giuliani (VP. Canidate).
i agree that the Democratic party will need to revamp a good portion of its policies prior to winning anything (house, senate, presidency). My choices are due to it is ripe for the time of a woman and a non-white to be in the main offices of power. Long overdue.