You really believe there was NO evidence at all? Thats absurd to say that we had no reason and no evidence at all for taking down Saddam. While you take the tin foil off your head are you also going to tell me Osama wasn't a terrorist and wasn't involved in the World Trade Center bombings?
Originally posted by Silvercord
Because, you know, when the inspectors can't find anything it's definitely a good idea for the president to declare war on the country they're inspecting instead of sending more inspectors over. Good thinking.
So to clarify:
No evidence = more reason to declare war, because you are giving them too much time to hide what you can't prove exists? I'll write that down in my Handy Dandy Notebook!