View Poll Results: Would you like to see a network programming board?

Voters
47. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    23 48.94%
  • no

    16 34.04%
  • I don't care

    8 17.02%

Thread: Network Programming Board

  1. #16
    Just one more wrong move. -KEN-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    3,227
    The fact that people are too dumb to post their socket questions to the language-specific boards aren't _our_ faults now, are they?

    Then again, I don't care. Adding "Sockets" to the platform-specific boards wouldn't be a horrible idea. I've heard worse.

  2. #17
    Toaster Zach L.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    2,686
    >> We can speculate all we want about whether or not this board would draw in enough posts to warrant its creation, but the only way to actually find out is to create it for a period of time. It IS possible that creating this board would generate more posts about socket programming.

    It is possible that it'll generate a large quantity of pink elephants as well. At any rate, yeah... worth a try I suppose. It would be kind of nice to have.
    The word rap as it applies to music is the result of a peculiar phonological rule which has stripped the word of its initial voiceless velar stop.

  3. #18
    Registered User Xei's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    719
    What is it with people and wanting new boards lately? Seriousely, we don't need any more General Forums, .NET Forums, or Networking forums, etc. All of these questions can be asked on a related board. I really don't think that it's necessary to have a board specifically for Networking because there isn't really a great population demanding such a specific topic. We can always make a 'Sticky' or a tutorial for sockets which would solve FAQ's.
    "What are you after - the vague post of the week award?" - Salem
    IPv6 Ready.
    Travel the world, meet interesting people...kill them.
    Trying to fix or change something, only guaruntees and perpetuates its existence.
    I don't know about angels, but it is fear that gives men wings.
    The problem with wanting something is the fear of losing it, or never having it. The thought makes you weak.

    E-Mail Xei

  4. #19
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    I would agree if the board was strictly for networking, but i think we decided that my idea to expand upon that is a good one. So fa the majority wants it but hey, i'll live if we dont its not life or death...

  5. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    913
    sorry to butt in here.

    people will never read the faq. people will always cross post. why let this stop you from anything?

    if you think we shouldnt add specialties then why do we have a c++ board, its just c isnt it?

    i think hammer said it best "But then network programming is an interesting subject...". so why not? if the admin says theres enough space why not, it migh make him more cash(or break even, i dont know which).

    but then again i cant argue with salem, "the regulars will have yet another board to look at".

    if there wasnt a network board it would just goto c, so your not really taking up that much more space.

    those are the only point you really have to think about.


    if you are serious about this why didnt you talk to the admin?

  6. #21
    I lurk
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,361
    Originally posted by Xei
    What is it with people and wanting new boards lately? Seriousely, we don't need any more General Forums, .NET Forums, or Networking forums, etc. All of these questions can be asked on a related board. I really don't think that it's necessary to have a board specifically for Networking because there isn't really a great population demanding such a specific topic. We can always make a 'Sticky' or a tutorial for sockets which would solve FAQ's.
    To be honest, I haven't seen many requests for viable new boards (those which have to do with C/C++) Sure networking questions could be posted to a related board, but as I said in a previous post, that's part of the problem.

    Again, like I said, you can speculate all you want whether or not there's enough interest to warrant such a board but the only real way to find out is to create one.

  7. #22
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    >>it migh make him more cash(or break even, i dont know which).

    neither. As far as asking the admin, it would be based on vote of the ppl, and i am sure this thread has been brought to wm's attention.

  8. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    913
    neither.
    surprising. the boards normally seem popular(well not now but before. i guess no more classes in some schools). is bandwidth that bad for a mostly text site?

    maybe i should just download the faq and vvv's post...

  9. #24
    carry on JaWiB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,972
    I was almost for the idea, but thinking back, only a few posts about network programming are ever made, and many times its something like:

    Look into socket programming.
    And the other times the question is answered. Of course, I tend to forget things that seem unimportant to me...
    "Think not but that I know these things; or think
    I know them not: not therefore am I short
    Of knowing what I ought."
    -John Milton, Paradise Regained (1671)

    "Work hard and it might happen."
    -XSquared

  10. #25
    Just because ygfperson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    2,490
    What's the harm in trying?

  11. #26
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    Originally posted by Sean
    That would be too smart. You're taking away our right to whine.
    I disagree. See theres a 50-50 shot for both of us. Theres a 50% chance this will increase your right and reason to whine. Gamble with us.

  12. #27
    Registered User zahid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    531
    I said "Yes".

    There could be a place specific for Network Programming.
    [ Never code before desk work ]
    -------------------------------------:-->
    A man who fears Nothing is the man who Loves Nothing
    If you Love Nothing, what joy is there in your life.
    =------------------------------------------------------= - I may be wrong.

  13. #28
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    Well the last topic for a forum section went about this long and then it was said that the people had spoken for the no option, looks like a yes, lets try it.

  14. #29
    Its not rocket science vasanth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    1,683
    I dont see the need for a new board.... Too many boads not a good idea.. I hardly see few questions related to network programming..

  15. #30
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    the majority wants to try it. If we go by the deciding factors given in the last topic on a new forum (the .net forum) then this means a trial is called for.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Need a second opinion - code error and i cant see it
    By bigfootneedhelp in forum C Programming
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 10-25-2007, 06:02 AM
  2. Constructor problem
    By rebel in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-11-2006, 06:45 AM
  3. function trouble
    By rebel in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-21-2005, 05:23 AM
  4. Pick a number....
    By Salem in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 01-19-2003, 07:27 AM