Thread: he he he

  1. #1
    l'Anziano DavidP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Plano, Texas, United States
    Posts
    2,743

    he he he

    Using my compiler I am assembling a pyrohedrogonalenial mongolinian data joded application using the Windows API sequencing drivers and DLL handle rewinners. If I rearrange the pointers in the loaded foadlink and replace the starting pointer's data with a bool and then deleting the hydrochycleimia from the juntik box, I could speed up the defgon regs by 200 clock cycles, but it would not allow me to directly address the array indexes. but then if i took the foadlink and replaced it with a klocit, i could speed up the program by 100 clock cycles and still use direct addressing. what should i do?
    My Website

    "Circular logic is good because it is."

  2. #2
    Back! ^.^ *Michelle*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    568
    Holy, what on earth are you talking about?
    Michelle (o^.^o)
    *Unique*
    Kaomoji House

  3. #3
    Linguistic Engineer... doubleanti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    2,459
    jargon i tells ya! jargon!!! [insert rambling obscenities here...]
    hasafraggin shizigishin oppashigger...

  4. #4
    &TH of undefined behavior Fordy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    5,793
    Using my compiler I am assembling a pyrohedrogonalenial mongolinian data joded application using the Windows API sequencing drivers and DLL handle rewinners. If I rearrange the pointers in the loaded foadlink and replace the starting pointer's data with a bool and then deleting the hydrochycleimia from the juntik box, I could speed up the defgon regs by 200 clock cycles, but it would not allow me to directly address the array indexes. but then if i took the foadlink and replaced it with a klocit, i could speed up the program by 100 clock cycles and still use direct addressing. what should i do?

    Ctrl-Alt-Del.....

    And upgrade to Windoze XP

  5. #5
    Normal vector Carlos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Budapest
    Posts
    463
    Fordy, you're totally wrong.

    If you delete the hydrochycleimia from the juntik box, this will flood your newtonian array with random monocyclic hypernostradamian space fragments, which is (theoratically proved) in contradiction with the megagalactical spheroid multiplex theory.

    I'd rather optimize the juntik box, using the empyrical Boyle-Marion approach (bug-modelling using limited number of real bugs - for details see South Park).

    Have fun (and mention my name in da source!).

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed