Thread: Mac programming?

  1. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    29
    I've never been one for those emulators. I like speed, and architecture emulation makes my kickass computer that much worse...I'm crazy like that, won't even use object bar or any of that crap.

    Macs didn't compete with the pc for one simple reason: the ibm pc could be made by any company who wanted. Apple has kept everything in house. Bad move. They did a short thing where they let another company make one or two of them...but they shut that down quick. SO you have a ton of companies competeing with each other, driving prices down on the pc side. The Mac, with no competetion, stays on the wayside.

    It prob does have a better pc...many think...obviously more elegant...but IBM and Motorola have not advanced it as fast as Intel. It is faster at lower speeds...but those speeds just arn't high enough. Apple is thinking of jumping ship on the whole IBM/Motorla deal.

    Other than that....I think OSX is a great OS. One of apples best moves. Windows XP is pretty nice too...though I liked 2000 a bit more.

    As far as one doing picture or sound better....the differences are almost too ridiculus to matter.

  2. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    272
    >I like speed, and architecture emulation makes my kickass computer that much worse...I'm crazy like that, won't even use object bar or any of that crap.<

    The next most significant bottleneck is the user.

    >The Mac, with no competetion, stays on the wayside.<

    This may be true; but could the two have survived if apple had chosen differently? No matter how small (or how crap the hardware) apple have dug themeselves a niche.

    >Windows XP is pretty nice too...though I liked 2000 a bit more.<

    What did 2000 have more of, that you liked?
    Joe

  3. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    29
    "No matter how small (or how crap the hardware) apple have dug themeselves a niche."

    Thats true...though mabye they would have gotton a niche anyway. Who knows...I'm just saying it's why it can't compete. Mabye it was a better business move if they didn't have a chance competeing anyway.

    I liked 2000 better...because it's basically offered me the same functionality...but it seemed quick and more responsive (those lesser hardware requirments) and it actually crashed less for me. I know XP offers more to some...but it hasn't to me. 2000 stoped a few of my games from running...but games arn't a priorty with me.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Mac OS X Users/C programmers?
    By petermichaux in forum C Programming
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-18-2011, 06:36 AM
  2. How to Send Mac Address From Client to Server
    By Lieyza197 in forum C Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-27-2009, 09:58 AM
  3. Mac backup software
    By brewbuck in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-12-2008, 08:21 PM
  4. Spoof MAC Address.
    By eXeCuTeR in forum C Programming
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-07-2008, 05:35 PM
  5. Newbie Question - fflush(stdin) & fpurge(stdin) on Mac and PC
    By tvsinesperanto in forum C Programming
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 03-11-2006, 12:13 PM