Guns run out of bullets, the sword will keep choppin' as long as you have the strength/stamina to use it.
Gun
Sword
Guns run out of bullets, the sword will keep choppin' as long as you have the strength/stamina to use it.
"Owners of dogs will have noticed that, if you provide them with food and water and shelter and affection, they will think you are god. Whereas owners of cats are compelled to realize that, if you provide them with food and water and shelter and affection, they draw the conclusion that they are gods."
-Christopher Hitchens
as far as video games go i get quit a kick out of shooting the crap out of other people with guns on the multiplayer. plus guns have the advantage of range, whereas with a sword you have to run all the way up next to them to kill um! so i think i prefer guns although i have nothing much against swords either.
yum, yum potatoes!!!!!
The sword.
More capable of inflicting damage, far less likely for the "noob killing the master by luck" syndrome, far more precise (in skilled hands). It is considerably easier to build defenses against bullets than against sword cuts/thrusts (esp. thrusts). That and in the real world I am reasonably competent with a katana.
One death is a tragedy, one million... a statistic.
-Josef Stalin
In case I forget, I use Bloodshed Dev C++ v.4
Pah, Swords are for 'cool' and '7331' people.
If youre smart you just pick the gun, why be cool with a nice
big sword? The result is the same, The gun justs kills faster.
A rifle with a bayonette? A little of both...
MagosX.com
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
I pick ICBM.
I'm also amazed to be the first to say this thread is stupid beyond reason.
-Govtcheez
[email protected]
Swords are far better at dealing damage. True, against an unprepared human, a sword is overkill (the very reason why this debate exists) however consider an armored opponent, bullets are relatively easy to defend against (decent metal armor is near impervious to most man portable firearms) while a decent slash (esp. with large European swords) can punch through most armor in a few swings. Soft body armor, while fairly effective versus firearms, is laughable against a sword.
One death is a tragedy, one million... a statistic.
-Josef Stalin
In case I forget, I use Bloodshed Dev C++ v.4
i think ill take a suitcase nuke over your icbm just because it is a little more easy to move around. but thats just me.
yum, yum potatoes!!!!!
>>> I'm also amazed to be the first to say this thread is stupid beyond reason.
You were not the first to think it.
Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity unto the dream.
yes it is stupid but that does not mean it isnt fun!!!!!
yum, yum potatoes!!!!!
How many bullets do you need to kill somebody at the sameOriginally posted by hk_mp5kpdw
Guns run out of bullets, the sword will keep choppin' as long as you have the strength/stamina to use it.
range as you would kil someone with a sword? Yes 1 bullet.
Sometimes just getting a head shot doesn't mean you got a kill. Maybe you just took the guy's jaw off or an ear. With a sword, a blow to the head (assuming no armor) is surely fatal due to crushing bone into the brain, severing of major arteries, etc.
A shot to the chest doesn't necessarily mean a perforated heart either. It is possible to miss killing someone by a fraction of a millimeter with a gun, just by not knowing exactly where the bullet will go (freak wind conditions have been known to spoil aim).
One death is a tragedy, one million... a statistic.
-Josef Stalin
In case I forget, I use Bloodshed Dev C++ v.4
Let's assume you can goddamn aim ok? Many people cant evenOriginally posted by deathstryke
Maybe you just took the guy's jaw off or an ear.
lift a sword nor handle it.
That would be like me saying let's assume you can use a damn sword.Let's assume you can goddamn aim ok? Many people cant even
Plus, if your using a gun in melee range, there is a good chance that it will end in both dying simultaneously.
Do note that many kinds of mortal wounds don't actually kill for a period of hours or days after being sustained. I know quite a few people who have survived gunshot wounds, often with few ill effects after recovery. Most sword wounds (intended to kill) cause far too much damage to tissues to survive without being maimed. However this just boils down to how bad you want the guy dead. If you have enough willpower, it is extremely difficult to sustain enough damage to keep you from finishing the job in melee combat.
Last edited by deathstryke; 01-28-2003 at 11:00 AM.
One death is a tragedy, one million... a statistic.
-Josef Stalin
In case I forget, I use Bloodshed Dev C++ v.4
Well, at the distance you stand to be able to use a sword
you can make a fatal wound with a gun.
You cant possible miss your target standing at a sword distance.