Thread: Follow Iraq, North Korea trying to mess the World.

Do you guys think that North Korea tactically jump in to play World political game at the same time with Iraq to mess up the
Whole World?
To me, North Korea is big liar to Nuclear program Pact agreement.
and North Korea is trying to create new tension in order to draw attention and the issue of massive destruction away over Iraq.
North Korea has been waiting tactically to mess up the World in right time.I hope US and the UN don't care about this country at this moment and let focus on peaceful resolving the problem over Iraq first. What do you think?

KingoftheWorld

Its the perfect time for the North Koreans. Its harder to fight 2 countries at once.

oh no, Korea has nukes,i'm shaking in my boots.

anyone heard of SDI?

pah.

Well, given that North Korea just had a diplomat host a surprise meeting to discuss the matter, I think not.

Kim Jong-ill is not a stupid person, and I highly doubt he would ruthlessly try to nuke the United States; plus, the taepo dong missile system could not get farther than Japan anyway. On top of that, it would take them over a year to harvest enough military grade plutoniom from nuclear waste to make one bomb.

North Korea is a starving Nation and they are looking for one major thing: kickbacks.

I'm not too worried about North Korea; I'd just like to see the 20 suitcase bombs accounted for.

Well all this would not have happened if the US had not stoped the oil supply to north korea.....

>>anyone heard of SDI?<<

Yeah, Space Defence Initiative, but as far as I knew it never got built. Politics between the US and Russia meant it got put on the shelf.

>>This will be World War III<<

I really hope not, wasn't it Einstein who said:

"I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones"? Sounds eerily true to me.

I really don't get all this tension stuff at all. Only the US is responsible for all that's happening.

1. America has no right what-so-ever to stop other countries of the world for making nukes or missiles. It can't even blame anyone for doing such a thing. The GREATEST threat to the world is america's nuclear program, not anyone elses'. Remember that uptill now only America has ruthlessly used two atom bombs (on Japan) and killed millions of people. The credit for starting a multi-national Nuclear and ballistic missiles race also goes to the US, coz they started it all.

2. Iraq is complying with the UN and letting the inspectors visit every place of their interest. It even agreed to let CIA into the country and do all the investigation they want to do. Yet, America has not stopped spreading it's war syndrome. It PROVES that America has some other intentions in doing so, cause now there's no sense in attacking IRAQ, when it has nothing to hide.

3. America threatens IRAQ, saying, "WE WILL NUKE YOU". Isn't this bare aggression and terrorism? Does it make any sense in attacking IRAQ with the logic that they "might" attack America, when there is no such indication?

4. If America does attack IRAQ (which is not at all doubtfull), what will be the consequences? Other countries will also start nuclear programs, to defend themselves for any future American aggression. IMO, America's the only one responsible for starting nuclear arms race among China, Pakistan, India, North Korea, Iran, Iraq, Israel and so on.

Here we go again

First, I don't like the current US politics, I don't like war at all. The citizens of Iraq have suffered so much under the regime of Saddam Hussein, under the wars (Iran, Gulf War), and under the sanctions of the UN. And now they should go into another war?

> It PROVES that America has some other intentions in doing so

Ofcourse it is not only the weapons. Saddam and his regime must be removed. The problem is that if you only kill Saddam, probably one of his followers will take Saddam's place and then still the people of Iraq are not freed from the regime.

> If America does attack IRAQ (which is not at all doubtfull), what
> will be the consequences?

A lot of people from Iraq will fly to other countries to find a safe place where they will not be bombed. They will fly to the countries around them and farther. In Europe there currently are a lot of people who fled from wars, hunger and other things.

Another consequence will probably be that the people in Arab countries will attack people from western world. I've read that western soldiers in Afghanistan will not be safe when Iraq will be attacked. I also read that if Iraq will be attacked, terrorists in the western world will get active.

There are probably a lot more things, world politics is very complex.

I wonder if attacking Iraq will really help eliminating terrorism. In my opinion it will spread terrorism around the world more than ever.


"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind"
- Mahatma Gandhi

>> Ofcourse it is not only the weapons. Saddam and his regime must be removed.

America has no right to do that, atleast not without the UN's approval.