Yes but humans now live in a controlled environment, everyone recieves the same care... it's not survival of the fittest. Everyone passes on their genes (well, most do anyway) even those who wouldn't normally survive past birth. If anything, we're already "opressing" the natural course of evolution; "bad" genes have/will be passed on, ad infinitum.Originally posted by Shadow12345
excessive cloning = same genetic material replicated
evolution relies on ability for a species' genetic code to have unpredictable mutations, the mutations that provide some type of advantage and help that organism survive stay. so to tie my thoughts together cloning is kindof like anti evolution. im not saying it would kill off humans, just throwing out a new idea (or maybe it isn't new, i haven't read all the posts on this thread, they're too long).
I'm all for cloning. If anything I think cloning the best of the best would make the human race stronger. You're still retain your individuality when you're a clone... like someone said; you recieve all your genetic material from one person instead of two.
Edit:: Some people don't seem to get it. A clone is ONLY an exact copy of genetic material... you could grow up to be a completly different person than your clone if faced with different situations.