"I misspelled evolution.
Lack of responsibility is worse than lack of evidence"
What on Earth are you talking about?
"I misspelled evolution.
Lack of responsibility is worse than lack of evidence"
What on Earth are you talking about?
Sacrifices to god were done for protection from sin.Gotcha... Slaughter and sacrifice can so easily be misleading. And here I thought all that stuff was bad! What was I thinking?
Genesis mentions how god made garments of animal skin for adam and eve.
No, just stuft you agree with right?It all comes back to my previous statement: If you have no counter argument, stop responding instead with unrelated nonsense!
Mercy killing.Wipe out all the life on Earth bar Noah's family and a few other animals
In order to test him and show abrahams absoulte obidiencesadistically make Issac think he's got to sacrifice his son.
to god.
When I said I have no blood on my genes, I'm making theWhat on Earth are you talking about?
connection to the blood on the hands. Substition of fate
instead of evidence.
"Mercy killing."
............... you're insane.
"In order to test him and show abrahams absoulte obidience
to god."
God doesn't need to test him, God ALREADY KNOWS he would pass the test, so he just put him through it for kicks.
Anyway what about the quotes huh?
Translational problems?
Lets see:
New International Version:
"The Sabbath-Breaker Put to Death
32 While the Israelites were in the desert, a man was found gathering wood on the Sabbath day. 33 Those who found him gathering wood brought him to Moses and Aaron and the whole assembly, 34 and they kept him in custody, because it was not clear what should be done to him. 35 Then the LORD said to Moses, "The man must die. The whole assembly must stone him outside the camp." 36 So the assembly took him outside the camp and stoned him to death, as the LORD commanded Moses. "
New American Standard Bible
"Sabbath-breaking Punished
32 Now while the sons of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man (1) gathering wood on the sabbath day.
33 Those who found him gathering wood brought him to Moses and Aaron and to all the congregation;
34 and they put him in custody (2) because it had not been declared what should be done to him.
35 Then the LORD said to Moses, "The man shall surely be put to death; (3) all the congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp."
36 So all the congregation brought him outside the camp and stoned him to death with stones, just as the LORD had commanded Moses. "
Amplified Bible
"32While the Israelites were in the wilderness, they found a man who was gathering sticks on the Sabbath day.
33Those who found him gathering sticks brought him to Moses and Aaron and to all the congregation.
34They put him in custody, because it was not certain or clear what should be done to him.
35And the Lord said to Moses, The man shall surely be put to death. All the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp.
36And all the congregation brought him without the camp and stoned him to death with stones, as the Lord commanded Moses."
New Living Translation
"Penalty for Breaking the Sabbath
32One day while the people of Israel were in the wilderness, they caught a man gathering wood on the Sabbath day. 33He was apprehended and taken before Moses, Aaron, and the rest of the community. 34They held him in custody because they did not know what to do with him. 35Then the LORD said to Moses, "The man must be put to death! The whole community must stone him outside the camp." 36So the whole community took the man outside the camp and stoned him to death, just as the LORD had commanded Moses."
King James Version
"32 And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day.
33 And they that found him gathering sticks brought him unto Moses and Aaron, and unto all the congregation.
34 And they put him in ward, because it was not declared what should be done to him.
35 And the LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp.
36 And all the congregation brought him without the camp, and stoned him with stones, and he died; as the LORD commanded Moses"
English Standard Version
"A Sabbathbreaker Executed
32While the people of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man gathering sticks on the Sabbath day. 33And those who found him gathering sticks brought him to Moses and Aaron and to all the congregation. 34They put him in custody, because it had not been made clear what should be done to him. 35And the LORD said to Moses, "The man shall be put to death; all the congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp." 36And all the congregation brought him outside the camp and stoned him to death with stones, as the LORD commanded Moses."
Contemporary English Version
"A Man Put to Death for Gathering Firewood on the Sabbath
32Once, while the Israelites were traveling through the desert, a man was caught gathering firewood on the Sabbath. [1] 33He was taken to Moses, Aaron, and the rest of the community. 34But no one knew what to do with him, so he was not allowed to leave. 35Then the LORD said to Moses, " Tell the people to take that man outside the camp and stone him to death!" 36So he was killed, just as the LORD had commanded Moses. "
New King James Version
"Penalty for Violating the Sabbath
(1) 32 Now while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man gathering sticks on the Sabbath day. 33And those who found him gathering sticks brought him to Moses and Aaron, and to all the congregation. 34They put him under guard, because it had not been explained what should be done to him.
35Then the LORD said to Moses, "The man must surely be put to death; all the congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp." 36So, as the LORD commanded Moses, all the congregation brought him outside the camp and stoned him with stones, and he died. "
21st Century King James Version
"32 And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man who gathered sticks upon the Sabbath day.
33 And those who found him gathering sticks brought him unto Moses and Aaron and unto all the congregation.
34 And they put him under guard, because it was not declared what should be done to him.
35 And the LORD said unto Moses, "The man shall be surely put to death. All the congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp."
36 And all the congregation brought him outside the camp and stoned him with stones, and he died, as the LORD commanded Moses."
American Standard Version
"32 And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man gathering sticks upon the sabbath day.
33 And they that found him gathering sticks brought him unto Moses and Aaron, and unto all the congregation.
34 And they put him in ward, because it had not been declared what should be done to him.
35 And Jehovah said unto Moses, The man shall surely be put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp.
36 And all the congregation brought him without the camp, and stoned him to death with stones; as Jehovah commanded Moses."
Young's Literal Translation
"32 And the sons of Israel are in the wilderness, and they find a man gathering wood on the sabbath-day,
33 and those finding him gathering wood bring him near unto Moses, and unto Aaron, and unto all the company,
34 and they place him in ward, for it [is] not explained what is [to be] done to him.
35 And Jehovah saith unto Moses, `The man is certainly put to death, all the company stoning him with stones, at the outside of the camp.'
36 And all the company bring him out unto the outside of the camp, and stone him with stones, and he dieth, as Jehovah hath commanded Moses."
Darby Translation
"32 And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness they found a man gathering sticks on the sabbath day.
33 And they that found him gathering sticks brought him to Moses and Aaron, and to the whole assembly.
34 And they put him in custody, for it was not declared what should be done to him.
35 And Jehovah said to Moses, The man shall certainly be put to death: the whole assembly shall stone him with stones outside the camp.
36 And the whole assembly led him outside the camp, and stoned him with stones, and he died, as Jehovah had commanded Moses."
New International Version - UK
"The Sabbath-Breaker Put to Death
32While the Israelites were in the desert, a man was found gathering wood on the Sabbath day.
33Those who found him gathering wood brought him to Moses and Aaron and the whole assembly,
34and they kept him in custody, because it was not clear what should be done to him.
35Then the LORD said to Moses, The man must die. The whole assembly must stone him outside the camp.
36So the assembly took him outside the camp and stoned him to death, as the LORD commanded Moses."
Lets see how you're going to worm your way out of this one.
"When I said I have no blood on my genes, I'm making the
connection to the blood on the hands. Substition of fate
instead of evidence."
You do realise that makes no sense right?
It makes sense to me but I said it more as a jokeYou do realise that makes no sense right?
rather than prove a point. You were supposed to get
it since in previous post I said something to the effect
of "if that's going to be your excuse to a crime..."
Freewill but also show us how to obey god. Look at theGod doesn't need to test him, God ALREADY KNOWS he would pass the test, so he just put him through it for kicks.
new testament and where jesus is tempted.
The man who was stoned was probably disobeying
god on purpose. Once the rules have been set, they
must follow them. Death is not
absolute punishment though.
"It makes sense to me but I said it more as a joke
rather than prove a point. You were supposed to get
it since in previous post I said something to the effect
of "if that's going to be your excuse to a crime...""
Ok..... so we'll write that one off as some bizare form of humour.
"Freewill but also show us how to obey god. Look at the
new testament and where jesus is tempted"
And that answers the question....... how? God ALREADY KNEW Issac would pass the test, he already knew he was honorable/obedient/good/etc. but he put him through it anyway for kicks.
"The man who was stoned was probably disobeying
god on purpose. Once the rules have been set, they
must follow them. Death is not
absolute punishment though"
I really hope there are people reading this stuff....... God kills man for picking up sticks, but no no hes entirely benevolent......... not small minded......... not petty......... not egotistical in the EXTREME...... no no, none of that.
Like i said I really hope there are people who are on the belief/non-belief border reading this stuff.
Last edited by Clyde; 11-29-2002 at 12:36 PM.
God must follow what he says. When he says that youreally hope there are people reading this stuff....... God kills man for picking up sticks, but no no hes entirely benevolent......... not small minded......... not petty......... not egotistical in the EXTREME...... no no, none of that.
must surely die, you will surely die. Benevolent must also
mean telling the truth.
Abraham could have disobeyed god. It is example of absoluteAnd that answers the question....... how? God ALREADY KNEW Issac would pass the test, he already knew he was honorable/obedient/good/etc. but he put him through it anyway for kicks.
obediance to god. We also do not know what God knows.
I think that our freewill means that god doesn't know what
we are going to do.
"God must follow what he says. When he says that you
must surely die, you will surely die. Benevolent must also
mean telling the truth"
LOL thats a fantastic argument: God's good because when he SAYS hes going to kill you he DOES kill you.............
"Abraham could have disobeyed god. It is example of absolute
obediance to god. We also do not know what God knows.
I think that our freewill means that god doesn't know what
we are going to do"
He could have, you mean God wouldnt have known that before he did it? Oh right i SEE, sorry i thought God was all-knowing, my bad. LOL like I said internally inconsistent, God is said to be all-knowing yet there are things he does not know.
Anyway thats just one of many many more quotes showing your "benevolent" God. What about our poor slave? Hmm?
Another translation error?:
New International Version
"20 "If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, 21 but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property. "
New American Standard Bible
"20 "If a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod and he dies at his hand, he shall be punished.
21 "If, however, he survives a day or two, no vengeance shall be taken; (1) for he is his property. "
Amplified Bible
"20And if a man strikes his servant or his maid with a rod and he [or she] dies under his hand, he shall surely be punished.
21But if the servant lives on for a day or two, the offender shall not be punished, for he [has injured] his own property"
New Living Translation
"20"If a male or female slave is beaten and dies, the owner must be punished. 21If the slave recovers after a couple of days, however, then the owner should not be punished, since the slave is the owner's property"
King James Version
"20 And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished.
21 Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money."
English Standard Version
"20"When a man strikes his slave, male or female, with a rod and the slave dies under his hand, he shall be avenged. 21But if the slave survives a day or two, he is not to be avenged, for the slave is his money"
Contemporary English Version
"20Death is the punishment for beating to death any of your slaves. 21However, if the slave lives a few days after the beating, you are not to be punished. After all, you have already lost the services of that slave who was your property. "
New King James Version
"20"And if a man beats his male or female servant with a rod, so that he dies under his hand, he shall surely be punished. 21Notwithstanding, if he remains alive a day or two, he shall not be punished; for he is his property. "
21st Century King James Version
"20 "And if a man smite his servant or his maid with a rod, and he die under his hand, he shall be surely punished.
21 Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished; for he is his money."
American Standard Version
"20 And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall surely be punished.
21 Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money."
Young's Literal Translation
"20 `And when a man smiteth his man-servant or his handmaid, with a rod, and he hath died under his hand -- he is certainly avenged;
21 only if he remain a day, or two days, he is not avenged, for he [is] his money."
Darby Translation
"Exodus 21
20 And if a man strike his bondman or his handmaid with a staff, and he die under his hand, he shall certainly be avenged.
21 Only, if he continue [to live] a day or two days, he shall not be avenged; for he is his money."
New International Version - UK
"Exodus 21
20If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished,
21but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property."
Now bear in mind God having the guy stoned to death for picking up sticks and condoning slavery/beating of slaves are just two examples from many many many more.
The "God hypothesis" is completely internally inconsistent.
Last edited by Clyde; 11-29-2002 at 12:41 PM.
Uhh, thank you for your time, you're disqualified from jury service.Originally posted by Nick
Death is not
absolute punishment though.
Truth is a malleable commodity - Dick Cheney
>>Sacrifices to god were done for protection from sin.
>>Genesis mentions how god made garments of animal skin for adam and eve.
See? This two sentances dont relate to each other. What is the purpose of this argument?
And why _were_ sacrifices done for protection, and not now? God change his mind? That would be difficult seeing as how he wouldnt have recieved any new information, seeing as how he already knows everything.
>>No, just stuft you agree with right?
No. Just make your responses corespond to the question. Is that so much to ask? This thread reads like this:
A: Invisible Kangaroos are possible then.
B: I had an apple at lunch.
A: Okay... What about x inconsistency?
B: I already answered that question.
A: No you didn't... Where?
B: Genesis mentions how god made garments of animal skin for adam and eve.
A: ...
>>I used to get disgusted, now I'm just amused...
I wish. I used to get amused, now I'm just disgusted.
"There's always another way"
-lightatdawn (lightatdawn.cprogramming.com)
The actual history of this probably goes back to when israelAnd why _were_ sacrifices done for protection, and not now? God change his mind? That would be difficult seeing as how he wouldnt have recieved any new information, seeing as how he already knows everything.
lost the ark of the convenment. This is where they performed sacrafices. God does not change his mind but our times are different just as Adam's time, Moses time, and jesus's time are different.
Someone all powerful can choose not to know. This wholeHe could have, you mean God wouldnt have known that before he did it? Oh right i SEE, sorry i thought God was all-knowing, my bad. LOL like I said internally inconsistent, God is said to be all-knowing yet there are things he does not know.
argument assumes god's knowledge is like ours.
I probably shouldn't have gotten into this but it seemsI wish. I used to get amused, now I'm just disgusted.
that Clyde is using falsehoods about christianity to prove
that there is no god. Actual arguments against the existance
of god cannot use contradictions about christianity or any other
religion.
I will get back on the slaverly issue but much more can be
said of the jewish exodus from egypt.
Got any proof that god exists yet, Nick?
No? Thought not.
Joe
Well, maybe they could, but then they wouldn't be omniscient, would they? And what kind of purpose would this serve? You're arguing the christian god KNEW Abraham was devout, etc, but purposefully deleted that info from his awareness (or, that god purposefully made herself unaware of this prior to the fact). Then god decided to test Abraham's piety, knowledge of which god deliberately erased from it's own awareness. This test involved killing his own son, which was apparently ok with Abraham. In other words, Abraham believed killing innocents was ok if justified by god. Does that ring any bells in contemporary circumstances?Originally posted by Nick
Someone all powerful can choose not to know. This whole
argument assumes god's knowledge is like ours.
For your second statement, is god's knowledge like ours... are you arguing we can understand something that god can't? Maybe we can, if god is deliberately erasing it's own awareness.
For the record, I believe there is a guiding intelligence of some sort in the universe a/o beyond this universe. I don't claim my belief is fact, nor do I believe any such intelligence is focused on any person or religion. But I recognize that as my belief, not fact.
Maybe some of you Christians posting should research the idea of faith v. fact. Faith can be a valuable quality, but it doesn't make something true. What kind of god would it be if you could prove its existence? One limited to your understanding, and frankly, by definition, if there is a god, it's got to be beyond our understanding.
Truth is a malleable commodity - Dick Cheney
Abraham didn't kill his own son. God sent an angle to stop him.This test involved killing his own son, which was apparently ok with Abraham. In other words, Abraham believed killing innocents was ok if justified by god. Does that ring any bells in contemorary circumstances?
My point is that we have freewill and this somehow means
that God as chosen not to know what our actions will be.