[quote]
"ok, try this Atoms were first theroized to exist by Democritus. He had no proof that they existed,"
Right........ however it WAS a reasonable hypothesis consistent with limitations present in th observeable world AND it was MERELY conjecture and was NOT "believed" to be fact untill evidence for it emerged.
"then scientst probly starting with Newton create the a corpuscular, or atomic, model yet there is still no proof of atoms"
... ok......
"Dalton proposed that all matter was made of atoms in the late 1700/early 1800's but he had not proved there existence."
....... yes.........
"It wasn't until Rutherford and his student C.T.R Wilson used a cloud chamber to show that if thin gold foil is bomared by heliun nuclei, most of the particles pass straight through but some were defected at a large angle"
And the conclusion is.........
"This deflection was caused by the alpha particles colliding wiht the nucleous of the gold atoms that we had proof of atoms"
Oh, there is no conclusion..... ok...... good argument.
[quote]
My point is this Cyde Lack of evidence does not mean that something does not exist. There is no logic in concluding that well since I have no evidence in either way it does not exist.
The most advanced area of Science is life, the most advanced life is humans........ according to science you are totally insignificant.
No.Branching into comedy again?
Tell me some flawsLMAO
oh and just because science can't explain it does not mean it's a flaw. Nor does someone misinturpreting it cause a flaw. Nor does someone deciding it say something it it no way does say make it a flaw.
Yet they don't think God is fake.UH because they don't think hes fake....... duh.
Diseases would of wiped us out long ago, there are people imunien to Aids, blackdeath, ect. You would need some sort of super disease witch would need to by created by Humans. As for a meterotie there are nummerous ways to deal with such problems.Yea cause its not like disease could ever wipe us out, or a meteorite.......
We are bright hairless apes, thats it, did you not grasp Sagan's quote? Here it is again:
'We live on a hunk of rock and metal that circles a humdrum star that is one of 400 billion other stars that make up the Milky Way Galaxy which is one of billions of other galaxies which make up a universe which may be one of a very large number, perhaps an infinite number, of other universes. That is a perspective on human life and our culture that is well worth pondering"
Thats the scientific perspective of humanity in the universe.
and as far as Science is belives, humanity is the only inteligence there is.
I'm tired of this argument. Lack of evidence does not mean it didnt' happen.Pardon me? The flaws in religion are that it is inherently IRRATIONAL; there is no evidence supporting there is no theory supporting it is is no different to believeing in a invisible kangaroo! I think thats a pretty freaking big flaw. Not to mention the huge swathes of the bible that if you take literally and YOU seem to take large potions literally are completely invalidated by the findings of science.
Time and time again if you compare what the Bible says happend and what science says happend it is the same thing. Only the bible was writen much long before science thought of it. Second many ancient civiliations had knowledge that we are only recently have begun to discover what this civilations already knew.And how exactly did you deduce that? Science provides NATURALISTIC explanations, and has shown time and time again that THEISTIC explanations are never right.
The Big Bang means there is a begining. Well if there is proof that means it isn't magic. Second I take what is writen in the Bible as true, just like any other historical piece.Yes, and that doesn't mean that if the universe existed forever it would have "ended" by now from expansion. The universe wasn't always expanding -- we have evidence of the big bang and can estimate when it happened if it did. There are also theories that there are other universes, and if that theory is correct, then isn't it also conceivable that maybe there were multiple big bangs in multiple universes and the matter that causes each of them comes from the expansion of others? It's very possible. Don't draw the conclussion that the universe has been expanding forever. We don't know much about what would have happened before the big bang, but just because we don't understand, doesn't mean we can make false conclussions. You can't say that there is a god simply because you don't understand. I'd like to believe in magic just like anyone else, but until there is proof of it, I'm not going to pretend like there is.
(minus ages)