Thread: God

Originally posted by Sentaku senshi
So thus "logicaly" you must conclude I have nothing hanging on my wall, witch is wrong.

No, we would logically conclude that we do not know what is hanging on your wall, just as we would logically conclude that we have no evidence for or against a god, but it is nevertheless improbable that such a thing exists and thus illogical to believe that such a thing exists (without obtaining some form of evidence, which we are yet to experience).

Originally posted by Sentaku senshi
yet until science can prove that somethign exisit it does not.

No, but until you have evidence that something does exist, it is illogical to believe that it does purely on the basis that you want it to exist.

Originally posted by Sentaku senshi
If large group of people wonderd in the desert for 40 years and then near the end of your journey the leader wrote down everything that happend if what they said was not true what do you think would happen? Expeicaly when this large group is often not potraid in a good light..

I don't know exactly what you're trying to get at here, but just because some people are said in a book to have walked through a desert for 40 years, does by no means mean they actually did. Even if they did, are you telling me that you can except whatever this leader writes down as the truth?

Originally posted by Sentaku senshi
Question Cyde How many weopons did Relgion Create?

Religion, itself may not have reached out and crafted the weapons with its own hands, but it was the fuel for many wars, which in turn were the fuel for the development of many of these weapons.

Originally posted by Sentaku senshi
Second question how many of this actions are supported by the Bible?

It has no real relevance what the bible says; religion was (and still is) the fuel of hatred for the majority of wars and acts of terrorism going on in the world today, whether the bible directly supports it or not.

Originally posted by Sentaku senshi
Love your neighbor as you love yourself: This is how christians are supose to act how do you love your neighbor by telling him they must die?

Exactly, religion as it exists today (and has existed for many years) is self-contradictory.

this is getting out of hand,

Cyde, you believe it is illogical, therefore you have faith in that logic, you percieve that you logic is better than others, therefore you dispute their beliefs of their logic as rubbish. you see what I'm saying? not that your wrong, nor that your right. but that because you believe you are right, you refute others beliefs as unscientifical. your problem mostly is you combine every religion and attack it, this is the equivilent of attacking the words of every scientist that ever lived, and because one was wrong, refuting the idea of science.

logic, as you have assumed, gives us the best possible answer, this is not always the correct one. what logic dictates means nothing. what is actually correct is all that matters.

just curious, how did you logicaly conclude there was no god?

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Sentaku senshi
Love your neighbor as you love yourself: This is how christians are supose to act how do you love your neighbor by telling him they must die?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Exactly, religion as it exists today (and has existed for many years) is self-contradictory

oh ye of little logic

logic would then dictate that the ones threatning with death are then not christians. theyare using the name of religion for the gain of power, money, wealth, and fame.

>what is actually correct is all that matters.

Yes, but do you know something the rest of us don't.

>just curious, how did you logicaly conclude there was no god?<

I can't speak for Clyde, but there is no God because there exists no means for scientifically proving God exists. How else are we to logically conclude anything? Do you want to hear 'Lack of disproof does not constitute proof' over and over again ? What part of this reasoning don't you understand?

Originally posted by Dissata
just curious, how did you logicaly conclude there was no god?

I don't think Clyde is concluding that there is definitely no god, but just that it is illogical to believe in one. Please correct me if I'm wrong, Clyde.

There is no solid evidence for or against a god, so we cannot say for definite that such a thing does or does not exist. BUT, it is still illogical to believe in such a thing without evidence to back that belief up. It is akin to believing that there is a pink teddy bear at the centre of the galaxy, just because there is currently no solid evidence against that. When you have no evidence, logic can only rely on how probable something is.

lack of evidence then logicaly would conclude evolution does not exists. since believe it or not, they hold just about the same quantity of proof as each other.

proof of god.

1)
Genetic code perfected almost 4 billion years ago. just a few million years after the first organism. much to little time to evolve.
implying that the genetic code already existed before the first organisms

2) the lack of evidence that this so called evolution breeched species. (all it was was natural selection throughout history from many different allready existing species. supposedly)

proof for evolution.

1) provides a basis as to the natural selection of monkeys. a reason our Dna is so closely matched.

2) protien chains, though not usable for any form of life, have been, in controlled conditions, and in semi-unrealistic, yet possible environment, have been created.


food for thought.

The Universe is not eternal. there had to have been something first, to create the energy, or at least replenish the kenetic energy that is lost after time. what caused the beginning of the universe? once what, how? once how or who, what was there first and how did it get there.

lack of evidence then logicaly would conclude evolution does not exists. since believe it or not, they hold just about the same quantity of proof as each other.

So? WTF has this got to do with proving god exists? Stop treating everthing like a religion.

food for thought.

In your dreams.

The Universe is not eternal. there had to have been something first, to create the energy, or at least replenish the kenetic energy that is lost after time. what caused the beginning of the universe? once what, how? once how or who, what was there first and how did it get there.

Yes and it was the schizophrenic god Jehovah you gave birth to the militant Jew who founded an apocalypse cult. I'm sure your aided leaps of imagination are well founded.

Originally posted by Dissata
food for thought.

The Universe is not eternal. there had to have been something first, to create the energy, or at least replenish the kenetic energy that is lost after time. what caused the beginning of the universe? once what, how? once how or who, what was there first and how did it get there.

You are assuming that the universe did begin. Who's to say that it hasn't existed for an infinite period of time? You are just used to things with beginnings and ends, as most probably everything you've ever encountered has a beginning and an end. You need to 'look outside of the box'.

Also, modern scientific belief states that energy cannot be destroyed (lost), it can merely be converted between different forms.

A perfect example of pride causing war.

Is this promoting religious argument through pseudo-religious proverbial bull****?? Or are you really trying to make a point here?

I'll ask as a humble person -

Can you prove the existence of god?

*long live amateur dramatics*

Just that human knowledge has it's limitations.
Most athiest have a certain type of pride in believing that everyone else who believes in a god is total idiot.

I agree with your first point....

but...

it's through limited humans that your god has shown itself. How does our limitations prove that you are correct. It's insanity.

Either we have proof that your god exists or we don't. Do you agree? Does pride affect this?